Dive into Manual Testing Interview Questions! Ace your interview with our guide on key Manual Testing Interview Questions for aspiring testers.
OVERVIEW
In a manual testing interview, you can expect to be asked a range of questions that test your knowledge of different types of manual testing, the testing life cycle, and the tools and techniques used in manual testing. This article provides an introduction to the basic concepts of manual testing and includes commonly asked interview questions with their answers. The questions are designed to be suitable for candidates with varying levels of skill, from beginners to experts. The Manual Testing interview can be easier to handle if you prepare and evaluate your responses in advance.
Now, let's explore a commonly asked interview questions related to Manual Testing, which are categorize into the following sections:
Remember, the interview is not just about proving your technical skills but also about demonstrating your communication skills, problem-solving abilities, and overall fit for the role and the company. Be confident, stay calm and be yourself.
Manual Testing Interview Questions
Note : We have compiled all Manual Testing Interview Questions List for you in a template format. Feel free to comment on it. Check it out now!!
Manual testing is a process of verifying the functionality of a software application or system manually by a human tester. It involves executing a predetermined set of test cases to determine whether the software performs as expected. Testers act as users and carry out typical user actions like clicking buttons and entering data to verify results. A dedicated team of testers uses different testing techniques like exploratory testing, boundary value analysis, and equivalence partitioning to ensure that the software meets requirements and is free of defects. Manual testing is typically carried out in a test environment that closely mimics the production environment to simulate real-world conditions. Manual testing allows testers to think creatively and identify defects that may be missed by automated testing. However, it is time-consuming and susceptible to human error. This testing method is suitable for small-scale projects or when the requirements are not well-defined, and the scope of testing is limited.
The Software Development Life Cycle is a methodology utilized by software development teams to manage the creation, implementation, and upkeep of software. It is comprised of several stages, each with its own specific goals, tasks, and deliverables. These stages include:
These stages may overlap or be combined depending on the development methodology being used, but they generally represent the main phases of the SDLC.
Manual testers play a crucial role in software development teams, responsible for verifying that the software being developed meets requirements and functions as intended. They collaborate closely with programmers, project managers, and other stakeholders to identify and report any defects or issues. The key roles and responsibilities of a manual tester in a software development team include:
Functional and non-functional requirements are two different types of requirements in software engineering. Here's the differences:
Aspects | Functional Requirements | Non-functional requirements |
---|---|---|
Definition | Describes what the system should do or the behavior it should exhibit. | Describes how the system should perform or the quality it should possess. |
Examples | Login functionality, search feature, order processing. | Response time, availability, reliability, scalability, security |
Measurability | Can be measured through user acceptance testing or functional testing. | Can be measured through performance testing, load testing, and other types of testing that evaluate system characteristics. |
Priority | Usually considered a higher priority as they directly relate to the functionality of the system. | Considered lower priority as they often relate to system performance, rather than system functionality. |
Implementation | Implemented using software development techniques and methodologies. | Implemented using system configuration, infrastructure design, and other techniques. |
Scope of impact | Impacts the system behavior or features. | It impacts the system performance or quality. |
Requirements type | Typically specific to the particular system being developed. | Generally applicable across multiple systems or projects. |
Functional requirements define what the system should do or what features it should have, while non-functional requirements describe how the system should perform or what quality attributes it should possess. Both types of requirements are important and necessary to ensure that the system meets the needs of the stakeholders.
In software engineering, validation and verification play crucial roles in ensuring that software products meet the required standards and specifications. Despite their interchangeable usage, these two terms have distinct meanings and purposes.
Validation | Verification |
---|---|
Validation is the process of reviewing or evaluating a finished product to confirm that it meets the user requirements and is fit for its intended use. | Verification is the process of evaluating the intermediate products or artifacts during the development process to ensure that they meet the specified requirements and standards. |
Validation is a dynamic testing process that involves actual testing of the software with various inputs and scenarios. | Verification is a static testing procedure that comprises checking to see if the design documentation, code, and other artifacts match the specified requirement and standard. |
Validation is performed at the end of the software development life cycle. | Verification is performed throughout the software development life cycle. |
Validation involves user acceptance testing (UAT), which is done by the end-users or customers. | Verification involves reviews, inspections, walkthroughs, and testing by the development team, quality assurance team, and other stakeholders. |
It focuses on the internal quality of the software, which is how well it adheres to the specified requirements and standards. | It focuses on the external quality of the software, which is how well it meets the customer's needs and expectations. |
Test cases are a predefined set of instructions used to verify whether a software application or system fulfills the specified requirements or desired specifications. Typically, a test case includes input data, expected output, and a series of steps to execute the test. The primary objective of test case creation is to detect any discrepancies or defects in the software and ensure its accurate functionality across various scenarios.
It plays a crucial role in software testing and is formulated based on requirements, design specifications, or user stories. They can be executed manually by testers or automated using testing tools or frameworks. By executing test cases and analyzing the obtained feedback, software quality, reliability, and performance can be enhanced.
A test case usually consists of several components that are essential to ensure the effective testing of software applications or systems. These components include:
The test case components can vary based on the type of software testing being performed, such as functional testing, integration testing, performance testing, or security testing. By including these components in a test case, software testers can effectively identify defects and ensure that the software meets the specified requirements and functions as expected.
White-box testing is a testing technique in software engineering that involves testing the internal workings of a software application or system. It is a method of testing where the tester has complete knowledge of the software's internal code, structure, and design. White-box testing is used to ensure that the software meets its functional and non-functional requirements by examining its internal behavior. This involves examining the code structure, testing individual code segments and modules, analyzing the control and data flow, executing test cases based on the internal workings of the software, and conducting code reviews and walkthroughs. White-box testing is useful in detecting complex bugs and is commonly used in unit testing, integration testing, and regression testing to ensure the software meets specified requirements.
Grey-box testing is a type of software testing that combines the principles of black-box and white-box testing. The tester does not have comprehensive knowledge of the internal workings of the software during this technique, but he or she does have access to certain information about the code structure, design, and functioning. The purpose of grey-box testing is to inspect the software from the user's perspective and recognize defects or issues that may impact the user experience. It's commonly employed in web applications, where testers have limited access to server-side code. The main objective of grey-box testing is to ensure that the software satisfies the expected requirements and enhance its quality. This technique is used in various testing stages such as integration, system, and acceptance testing and can be employed in conjunction with other testing methods.
Functional testing is a crucial software testing approach that centers around verifying a system or application's functional requirements and behavior. Its main objective is to make sure that the software adheres to the functional standards that have been specified as well as user expectations, and that it functions correctly and performs as planned. During functional testing, testers thoroughly examine the system's features and functionalities to validate their proper functioning and alignment with defined requirements. This entails testing various aspects, including input validation, data manipulation, user interface interactions, and the system's response to different inputs or user actions. It can be executed through different techniques, including manual testing and automated testing. There are several different kinds of functional testing methodologies, including unit testing, integration testing, system testing, acceptance testing, and regression testing. Each type focuses on different levels and aspects of the software, ensuring that all functional requirements are fulfilled, and any defects are identified and addressed.
Non-functional testing is a sort of software testing that assesses the performance, dependability, usability, and other non-functional elements of a system or application.
Unlike functional testing which focuses on verifying specific functional requirements, non-functional testing assesses how well the software meets quality attributes or characteristics that are not directly tied to its intended functionality. The aim of this testing is to measure and validate the software's behavior in terms of factors such as performance, scalability, security, usability, compatibility, reliability, and maintainability. It ensures that the software not only functions correctly but also performs optimally and provides a satisfactory user experience.
Usability testing is a technique utilized to assess a product's user-friendliness by having genuine users test it. The process entails observing individuals using the product to carry out tasks and collecting feedback on their experiences. The aim of usability testing is to uncover any usability issues and evaluate users' ability to complete tasks using the product. This testing method can be implemented on various products, including physical items, software applications, and websites. The outcomes of usability testing can assist designers and developers in enhancing the product's user interface and overall user experience, leading to higher levels of user satisfaction and engagement.
Software testing technique called compatibility testing examines how well an application or system performs across a range of settings, platforms, and configurations. To ensure seamless operation free of bugs or mistakes, this form of testing comprises assessing the software's compatibility with various operating systems, software applications, hardware devices, and network settings.
The objective of compatibility testing is to confirm that the software is compatible with all the systems and configurations it is expected to work on and to identify and resolve any compatibility issues that could cause software failures, crashes, or errors. It is an integral part of the software development process as it guarantees that the software performs seamlessly in all possible situations and settings, providing users with an exceptional experience across multiple platforms.
Performance testing is a software testing method that analyzes the speed, responsiveness, stability, and scalability of an application or system under varied workloads and situations. Its goal is to assess how effectively the programme runs in real-world circumstances and to identify any performance bottlenecks or concerns.
There are several methods for conducting performance testing, including load testing, stress testing, and endurance testing. Load testing measures the system's performance under typical and severe workloads, stress testing pushes the system past its limits to find the breaking point, and endurance testing assesses the system's performance over time. Performance testing's main objectives are to ensure that the programme satisfies the users' performance requirements and expectations and to find any potential performance issues.
Load testing is a performance testing technique that evaluates the performance and behavior of a system or application when subjected to anticipated or simulated loads. Its objective is to determine if the system can handle high user traffic and workloads without any performance degradation or failures.
To conduct load testing, the system is exposed to incremental levels of user traffic or simulated workloads to test its performance limits. The process identifies performance bottlenecks and measures the system's response time, resource utilization, and other critical performance metrics. Load testing can be done manually, automatically, or through cloud-based load testing services. The test results help developers optimize software performance and ensure that the system can manage user traffic and workloads efficiently.
Stress testing is a sort of software testing that is used to evaluate the reliability and security of a system or application under excessive workloads and unfavorable conditions. The purpose of stress testing is to determine the system's breaking point and to measure its ability to withstand high amounts of stress and strain. It involves subjecting the system to high levels of stress by increasing the workload beyond its normal operational capacity. The process aims to detect performance issues, such as crashes, slow response times, or unexpected behavior, that can occur under stressful conditions.
It can be conducted using a variety of techniques, such as spike testing, which involves increasing the workload suddenly and significantly, and soak testing, which involves subjecting the system to a prolonged workload to identify performance degradation over time.
Regression testing is a software testing technique used to ensure that recent changes or updates in a software application have not introduced new defects or caused existing functionalities to fail. It involves rerunning previously executed test cases to validate that the existing functionalities are still working correctly after the changes have been made.
Regression testing is used to find any unexpected consequences or regressions that might have happened as a result of software changes. It helps in maintaining the overall quality and stability of the application by ensuring that the previously tested features continue to function as expected. It ensure that recent changes or updates in a software application have not introduced new defects or caused existing functionalities to fail. It involves rerunning previously executed test cases to validate that the existing functionalities are still working correctly after the changes have been made.
Integration testing is a vital software testing technique that focuses on verifying the proper interaction and collaboration between different components or modules within a software system. Its primary objective is to ensure that these components integrate seamlessly, exchange data accurately, and function together without any issues.
During integration testing, instead of testing individual components separately, they are combined and tested as a group to assess their collective behavior. This approach allows for the detection of potential problems that may arise from the integration process, such as communication failures, data inconsistencies, or compatibility conflicts.
Integration testing is a crucial step in the overall software testing process and can be performed at various stages, including unit testing (testing individual units of code), system testing (testing the integrated system as a whole), and acceptance testing (testing the system's compliance with user requirements). By conducting integration testing, testers can ensure that the software system meets the desired functionality and works harmoniously with its various components.
System testing is a software testing approach that involves evaluating a fully integrated and complete software system or application. It aims to verify that the software works as intended and meets the specified requirements in the actual environment for which it is designed.
During system testing, the software is evaluated as a whole, including all its components, modules, and interfaces. This testing method focuses on the software's functionality as a complete system and its interaction with other systems and external dependencies. It encompasses various testing types, such as performance, security, and usability testing. It is conducted after integration testing and before acceptance testing. It plays a vital role in the software development process, ensuring that the software meets the end-users' requirements and expectations. The objective of system testing is to identify and resolve any defects or issues that may impact the software's performance before releasing it to users.
Acceptance testing is a software testing approach that assesses whether a software system meets the customer's expectations and requirements and is ready for release. It is conducted from an end-user perspective to verify that the system functions as intended and meets the specified criteria. Acceptance testing may involve both manual and automated testing techniques and can include functional and non-functional testing. Any defects found during acceptance testing are usually reported to the development team for rectification. Once all identified issues have been resolved, and the software passes acceptance testing, it is deemed suitable for release.
Exploratory testing is a dynamic software testing approach that involves simultaneous test design, execution, and learning. Testers, equipped with their understanding of the system and its behavior, actively explore and interact with the software to uncover defects and gain insights. Testers leverage their expertise and knowledge of the system to identify potential areas that are prone to issues or defects. They then design and execute tests on the fly, adapting their approach based on the feedback and observations from the system. It is particularly valuable in Agile and Rapid Application Development environments where requirements may be uncertain or evolving. Exploratory testing enables testers to adapt quickly to changing conditions and assess the software in an exploratory and investigative manner.
The primary advantage of exploratory testing is its ability to uncover defects efficiently. Testers can uncover hidden issues, assess software behavior in real-time, and make immediate observations about the quality of the system. By blending test design, execution, and learning, exploratory testing allows for a flexible and intuitive exploration of the software, leading to valuable insights and improvements.
Ad-hoc testing is a software testing approach that involves spontaneous attempts to find defects or issues in the software without following any pre-defined Test plan. The tester relies on their experience and intuition to identify and execute tests on different parts of the software that may have defects or issues. Ad-hoc testing is often used when there is limited time available for testing or when the testing team wants to supplement scripted testing with additional testing. The primary advantage of ad-hoc testing is that it allows testers to discover defects that may be difficult to identify using scripted or formal testing methods. However, it can be challenging to manage and reproduce results, and it may be less effective in uncovering all types of defects compared to other testing methods.
Smoke testing is a sort of software testing that examines whether an application's critical and fundamental functions are functioning properly. Its main objective is to ensure that the software build is stable enough for additional testing. Smoke testing is usually conducted after every new software build or deployment to confirm the operability of the most critical features. It helps save time and resources by detecting significant defects early in the development cycle. Furthermore, it can minimize the risk of launching unstable software builds to production.
In smoke testing, a basic set of test cases is executed to determine if the application's essential features are performing as expected. If the smoke test fails, it implies that the build is unstable, and no further testing can be conducted until the issues are resolved. Conversely, if the smoke test passes, it indicates that the build is stable and ready for further testing.
Smoke testing is particularly advantageous in Agile and DevOps settings where software builds are frequently released. It helps save time and resources by detecting significant defects early in the development cycle. Furthermore, it can minimize the risk of launching unstable software builds to production.
Sanity testing is a quick and focused software testing technique used to check if the important features of an application are working correctly after making changes or creating a new version. Instead of testing everything, it focuses on key areas or requirements that have been recently modified.
Sanity testing is done when time is limited and we need to quickly evaluate if the changes have caused any major issues. If the test fails, it means there are significant problems, and further testing cannot proceed until they are fixed. If the test passes, it indicates that the changes have not caused major problems, and additional testing can continue.
The purpose of sanity testing is to save time and resources by catching important problems early in the development process. It helps ensure that crucial parts of the software are functioning properly before conducting more thorough testing. This technique is particularly useful in Agile and DevOps environments where quick assessments are needed to avoid releasing unstable software.
A defect, also known as a bug, is an issue in a software application that causes it to behave in an unexpected or unintended way. Defects can manifest at any stage of the software development process, encompassing design, coding, testing, and deployment.
Developers or testers can make mistakes that result in defects, or they may encounter unforeseen issues when integrating different components of the software.
The severity of a defect can vary from minor cosmetic issues to critical failures that make the application unusable or put the security of the system at risk. To mitigate these risks, software development teams employ various techniques and methodologies, such as code reviews, testing, and continuous integration, to identify and address defects as early as possible in the development cycle. This helps to minimize the cost and impact of defects by catching them before they make their way into production.
The term "defect life cycle," which is sometimes used to refer to the "bug life cycle," describes the phases that a software issue or defect goes through until it is fixed or closed. The defect life cycle typically consists of several phases, including:
The defect life cycle is a framework for managing faults and guaranteeing their timely and efficient resolution. By following a standardized process, development teams can track the status of defects and ensure that they are properly addressed before the software is released to production.
In software development, a defect report or bug report is a crucial document that is used to report an issue or defect in a software application or system. This report is typically created by testers who are responsible for identifying issues during the testing phase of software development. The report often contains a description of the problem or defect, instructions for reproducing it, levels of severity and importance, information about the environment, and any supplemental files like screenshots. The defect report is then used by the development team to track and manage issues, prioritize them for resolution, and to identify the root cause of the problem. By fixing the issues identified in the defect report, the software application or system can be improved and made more reliable.
A traceability matrix is a document that is used to track and link requirements and test cases during the software development life cycle. The matrix maps the relationship between each requirement and the associated test cases, ensuring that all requirements have been tested and that all test cases are necessary to meet the requirements. The traceability matrix typically includes three columns: one for the requirement or business rule, one for the test case or test scenario, and one for the status of the test case (such as pass, fail, or not run). This matrix helps the development team ensure that all requirements are being met, and also helps with project management by providing a clear view of progress and identifying any gaps or missing requirements.
A test plan is an extensive document that provides a detailed overview of the strategy, goals, and approaches to be employed when testing a software application or system. It encompasses the definition of testing scope, required test environment, necessary resources, testing tasks, and projected timelines. Furthermore, it incorporates diverse testing methodologies, including functional testing, performance testing, and security testing, along with specific test cases and scenarios to be executed.
A test plan's main goal is to provide a thorough road map for the testing procedure, making sure that every component of the software application or system is thoroughly examined. It serves as a means to identify potential risks and challenges that may arise during testing and offers a framework for managing and mitigating those risks. Collaboration between the testing team and other stakeholders, such as the development team, is crucial in developing a test plan that aligns with the software development life cycle and meets project requirements.
A test strategy is a comprehensive document that provides a broad outline of the overarching approach and methodology for testing a software application or system. It establishes the goals, boundaries, available resources, and limitations that shape the testing process. The test strategy encompasses information about the testing approach, the types of testing to be conducted, and the specific responsibilities assigned to the testing team.
Early in the software development life cycle, the test strategy is a crucial component that is developed and plays a significant part in the overall project plan.
It acts as a manual for the testing team, making sure that the testing procedures adhere to the project's goals, client demands, and industry norms. Moreover, it aids in the identification of potential risks and challenges associated with testing and establishes a framework for effective risk management and mitigation.
Test plan | Test strategy |
---|---|
A comprehensive document that provides extensive information regarding the testing scope, goals, required resources, and specific tasks to be executed. | A top-level document that provides an overview of the general approach, methodology, and types of testing to be employed for a particular software application or system. |
Developed by the testing team in collaboration with the development team and other stakeholders. | Developed early in the software development life cycle, before the test plan. |
It acts as a guide for the testing procedure, ensuring thorough testing of the software application or system in all respects. | It offers guidance to the testing team, aligning testing activities with business objectives, fulfilling customer requirements, and adhering to industry standards. |
Encompasses specific information regarding the test cases, test scenarios, and test data that will be utilized throughout the testing phase. | Outlines the chosen testing approach, and the types of testing to be conducted, and clearly defines the roles and responsibilities of the testing team. |
Outlines the timelines for completion, the resources required, and the criteria for passing or failing the tests. | Identifies potential risks and issues that may arise during testing and provides a framework for managing and mitigating those risks. |
A comprehensive document utilized by the testing team to implement and oversee testing activities. | A top-level document is employed to steer the testing process, guaranteeing thorough and efficient testing coverage. |
A test environment is a configuration of hardware and software used for software testing that resembles the production environment. It includes all the necessary resources, such as hardware, software, network configurations, and others, required to perform testing on software applications or systems. The purpose of a test environment is to provide a controlled and consistent environment for testing, which helps identify and resolve issues and defects before the software is deployed into the production environment. The test environment can be hosted on-premise or in the cloud and should be planned and configured accurately to reflect the production environment. It should also be properly documented and managed to ensure consistency throughout the testing process.
Test data refers to the input data utilized to test a software application or system. It is processed by the software to verify if the expected output is obtained. Test data can come in different forms such as positive, negative, and boundary test data. Positive test data produces the anticipated output and meets the software requirements, while negative test data yields unexpected or incorrect results that violate the software requirements. On the other hand, boundary test data examines the limits of the software and is situated at the edge of the input domain.
The significance of test data lies in its ability to identify issues and defects that need to be resolved before the software is deployed in the production environment. Creating and selecting the right test data is crucial as it covers all possible scenarios and edge cases, resulting in thorough testing of the software.
Positive testing | Negative testing |
---|---|
Positive testing Verifies that the software or application behaves as expected when given the correct input. | Negative testing Verifies that the software or application responds appropriately when given incorrect input. |
It is designed to confirm that the software produces the desired output when given valid input. | It is designed to check that the software can detect and handle invalid or unexpected input. |
Aims to ensure that the software meets the functional requirements and specifications. | Aims to uncover any potential defects or flaws in the software that could lead to incorrect output or system failure. |
Helps to build confidence in the software's ability to perform its intended functions. | Helps to identify areas of weakness or vulnerabilities in the software. |
Typically performed by software developers or testers. | Typically performed by testers or quality assurance engineers. |
Features | Retesting | Regression testing |
---|---|---|
Definition | It is a testing process that validates the fixes done for a failed test case. | It is a testing process that validates that changes to the software do not cause unintended consequences on the existing features. |
Objective | To ensure that a bug is fixed correctly. | To ensure that the existing functionality is working fine after making changes. |
Execution | Executed after the bug is fixed. | Executed after the software is modified or enhanced. |
Focus | Testing focused on the specific failed test case. | Testing focused on the overall impact of changes. |
Scope | The scope of retesting is limited to the specific test cases that failed previously. | The scope of regression testing is broad, covering all impacted areas due to the changes made. |
Test cases | Executing test cases that previously failed is referred to as retesting. | Regression testing involves the execution of test cases that represent the existing functionality. |
Test results | In retesting, the expected results are already known because the test cases have failed previously. | The expected results need to be determined before executing the test cases. |
Timing | Retesting is performed in the same environment as the failed test case. | Regression testing is performed in a different environment than the failed test case. |
Importance | Retesting is important to ensure that the specific defect has been resolved. | Regression testing is important to ensure that the changes made do not impact the existing functionality. |
Outcome | The outcome of retesting is to determine if the bug is fixed correctly. | The outcome of regression testing is to identify if there are any impacts of changes on the existing functionality. |
Tools | Retesting can be performed using manual or automated testing tools. | Regression testing is mostly performed using automated testing tools. |
Test coverage is a measurement of the effectiveness of software testing, which determines the extent of the source code or system that has been tested. It gauges the percentage of code or functionality that has been executed through a set of tests. Test coverage can be measured at different levels of detail, such as function coverage, statement coverage, branch coverage, and path coverage. By analyzing test coverage, developers can identify areas of the code that have not been adequately tested, allowing them to create additional tests and enhance the overall quality of the software.
A software testing technique called equivalence partitioning divides input data into groups or divisions that ought to behave similarly. The methodology is founded on the premise that if a system functions correctly for one input value in a partition, it should function correctly for all values in that partition.
It helps to identify faults caused by improper treatment of input data, such as boundary value mistakes or input validation failures, by evaluating representative values from each partition and reducing the number of test cases necessary for comprehensive coverage.
For example, suppose a system accepts a numeric input between 1 and 1000. Equivalence partitioning would divide the input range into several partitions, such as values less than 1, values between 1 and 100, values between 101 and 500, and values between 501 and 1000. Test cases would be developed to represent each partition, and if a test case in a partition fails, then all other test cases in that partition would also be considered to have failed.
Boundary value analysis is a software testing approach that detects problems at the boundaries or edges of a system's or software component's input values. The technique involves testing input values at the boundary values and values just below and above them to identify defects in the system's handling of values at the limits of its input range. It can be applied at different levels of granularity and is often used in conjunction with equivalence partitioning for thorough testing of input data.
For example, if a system accepts an input range of 1 to 1000, boundary value analysis would involve testing input values at the boundary values, such as 1, 1000, and values just below and above them, like 0, 2, 999, and 1001. This technique can help identify defects in the system's handling of values at the limits of its input range, such as rounding errors, truncation issues, and overflow or underflow conditions.
The technique of error guessing in software testing involves utilizing the tester's knowledge, experience, and intuition of the system to identify possible errors or defects. This is an informal method that depends on the tester's capability to predict the occurrence of typical mistakes, faults, or errors that may arise during the testing phase.
The process of this testing involves the tester brainstorming potential errors based on their experience and knowledge of the system. This may include drawing on their experience of similar systems or their knowledge of the specific system being tested to create likely scenarios. Once potential errors have been identified, the tester will attempt to replicate them in the system to confirm their existence. Error guessing can be helpful to find problems that formal testing methods might miss and to get a better knowledge of the system being tested. However, it should not be relied upon as the sole means of testing and should be used in conjunction with other formal testing techniques.
Pair-wise testing is a software testing methodology that involves reviewing all possible combinations of input parameters in pairs. It is also known as all-pairs testing or orthogonal array testing. During this process, testers discover the pairings of input parameters that are most likely to create software faults or defects.They then develop test cases by mixing these pairings to generate all conceivable input combinations.
When there are several input parameters to test and it is not possible to test all potential combinations, pair-wise testing comes in handy. Pair-wise testing can successfully uncover problems and errors in software by focusing on the most crucial pairs of inputs while requiring a relatively minimal number of test cases. This approach can help save time, efforts and resources in the testing process.
Statement coverage is a white-box testing technique that measures the proportion of code statements executed during the testing process. In other words, it refers to the percentage of program statements that have been tested at least once. During statement coverage testing, the testing team creates test cases that aim to execute each line of code at least once. The coverage percentage is calculated by dividing the number of statements executed by the total number of statements in the code.
Statement coverage is a useful metric to assess the thoroughness of testing and identify areas of code that have not been executed during testing. However, it does not guarantee that all possible outcomes have been tested or that the code is error-free. Therefore, other forms of testing, such as functional or integration testing, should also be performed in conjunction with statement coverage testing to ensure comprehensive test coverage.
Branch coverage is a metric used in software testing to measure the extent to which the source code of a program has been executed during testing. Specifically, it measures the percentage of all possible branches in the code that have been executed at least once during the testing process.
Branch coverage is significant since it demonstrates how completely a programme has been tested. A programme has likely been fully tested if a high percentage of its branches have been covered during testing, which means it is less likely to include bugs or problems that haven't been found yet.
The testing process must gather information regarding the branches that have been tested in order to compute branch coverage. Tools like code coverage analyzers or profilers, which keep track of the sections of the code that have been run during testing, can be used to accomplish this. After gathering this information, the percentage of branches covered may be computed by dividing the number of branches that were actually run by the total number of branches in the code.
Decision coverage is a metric used in software testing that measures the percentage of possible decision outcomes that have been executed during testing. A decision point in programming is a point where the program makes a decision between different outcomes based on a condition or variable. High decision coverage suggests that all possible outcomes have been tested, reducing the chance of undiscovered bugs or errors. Tools like code coverage analyzers or profilers can be used to track which outcomes have been executed during testing, and the percentage of decision outcomes covered can be calculated by dividing the number of executed decision outcomes by the total number of possible decision outcomes in the code.
MC/DC coverage, or Modified Condition/Decision Coverage, is a more rigorous testing metric used in software engineering to assess the thoroughness of testing for a program. It is a stricter version of decision coverage that requires every condition in a decision statement to be tested, and that the decision takes different outcomes for all combinations of conditions. MC/DC coverage is particularly useful in safety-critical systems, where high reliability is crucial. To achieve MC/DC coverage, code coverage analyzers or profilers are used to track which conditions and outcomes have been executed during testing, and the percentage of MC/DC coverage can be calculated by dividing the number of evaluated decisions that meet the MC/DC criteria by the total number of evaluated decisions in the code.
Code review is a software development practice that involves reviewing and examining source code to identify defects, improve code quality and ensure adherence to coding standards. It is an essential step in the development process that aids in the early detection of faults and problems, reducing the time and expense needed to resolve them later. Code review can be conducted in different ways, such as pair programming, or through the use of code review tools. The process helps to ensure the quality, reliability, and maintainability of software projects.
In software testing, a walkthrough is a technique where a group of people scrutinize a software system, component, or process for defects, issues, or areas of improvement. The reviewers inspect various aspects of the system, such as design, functionality, user interface, architecture, and documentation, to identify potential issues that could impact the system's usability, reliability, or performance. Walkthroughs can be done at any point during the software development lifecycle and can be used for non-technical documents like user manuals or project plans. Benefits of walkthroughs include detecting defects early, reducing development costs, and enhancing software quality. Furthermore, they can identify usability issues that can lead to a better user experience.
Code inspection is a technique used in software testing that involves a detailed manual review of the source code to identify defects, errors, and vulnerabilities. Developers typically conduct the review by examining the code line-by-line for syntax errors, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, and adherence to coding standards. The goal of code inspection is to enhance the quality of the software and detect issues early in the development process. This can save time and resources that might be spent on fixing problems later. Code inspection can be time-consuming and requires a skilled team of reviewers but is effective in finding defects that automated testing tools or normal testing procedures might miss.
Software testing techniques known as static testing involve analysing or assessing a software artifact, such as requirements, design documents, or source code, without actually running it. This review process can be carried out manually, with team members providing comments, or automatically, with the use of software tools that analyse the artifact and provide feedback or reports. Static testing can take the form of code reviews, walkthroughs, inspections, or formal verification at any point of the software development lifecycle. The fundamental benefit of static testing is that it can uncover errors early in the development process, saving money and time. Static testing is used in conjunction with other testing methods, such as dynamic testing, which involves running the software.
Dynamic testing is a software testing technique where the software is run and observed in response to various inputs. Its goal is to detect and diagnose bugs or defects while the software is executing. Testers simulate actual usage scenarios and provide different inputs to check how the software responds. This type of testing includes functional testing, performance testing, security testing, and usability testing. The test cases cover all possible scenarios to determine if the software works as expected. Dynamic testing is essential in the software development lifecycle to ensure that the software meets requirements and is defect-free before release to end-users.
Verification and validation are two important terms in software engineering that are often used interchangeably, but they have different meanings and purposes.
Verification | Validation |
---|---|
The process of analysing a system or component to evaluate whether it complies with the requirements and standards stated. | Determining whether a system or component fits the needs and expectations of the client by evaluating it either during or after the development process. |
It ensures that the software is built according to the requirements and design specifications. | It ensures that the software meets the users requirements and expectations. |
It is a process-oriented approach. | It is a product-oriented approach. |
It involves activities like reviews, walkthroughs, and inspections to detect errors and defects in the software. | It involves activities like testing, acceptance testing, and user feedback to validate the software. |
It is performed before validation. | It is performed after verification |
Its objective is to identify defects and errors in the software before it is released. | Its objective is to ensure that the software satisfies the customer's needs and expectations. |
It is a static process. | It is a dynamic process. |
Its focus is on the development process. | Its focus is on the end-product. |
A test scenario and a test case are both important components of software testing. While a test scenario is a high-level description of a specific feature or functionality to be tested, a test case is a detailed set of steps to be executed to verify the expected behavior of that feature or functionality.
Test scenario | Test case | |
---|---|---|
Definition | A high-level description of a hypothetical situation or event that could occur in the system being tested. | A detailed set of steps or conditions that define a specific test scenario and determine whether the system behaves as expected. |
Specify | It is a broad statement that defines the context and objective of a particular test. | It is a specific set of inputs, actions, and expected results for a particular functionality or feature of the system. |
Uses | It is used to identify different test conditions and validate the system's functionality under different scenarios. | It is used to validate the system's behavior against a specific requirement or functionality. |
Level of detail | Less detailed and more broad in scope | Highly detailed and specific |
Inputs | Requirements documents, user stories, and use cases | Test scenarios, functional requirements, and design documents |
Outputs | Test scenarios, which are used to develop test cases | Test cases, which are executed to test the software |
Example | Test scenario for an e-commerce website: User registration | Test case for user registration: 1. Click on "Register" button 2. Fill out registration form 3. Submit registration form 4. Verify user is successfully registered |
Smoke testing | Sanity testing | |
---|---|---|
Definition | A type of non-exhaustive testing that checks whether the most critical functions of the software work without major issues | A type of selective testing that checks whether the bugs have been fixed after the build/release |
Purpose | To ensure that the build is stable enough for further testing | To ensure that the specific changes/fixes made in the build have been tested and are working as expected |
Scope | A broad-level testing approach that covers all major functionalities | A narrow and focused testing approach that covers specific changes/fixes |
Execution time | Executed at the beginning of the testing cycle | Executed after the build is stabilized, just before the regression testing |
Test criteria | Test only critical functionalities, major features, and business-critical scenarios | Test only specific changes/fixes made in the build, |
Test depth | Shallow and non-exhaustive testing that focuses on major functionalities | Deep and exhaustive testing that focuses on specific changes/fixes |
Result | checks to see if the build is stable enough for additional testing. | Identifies whether or not the build's unique modifications and fixes are functioning as intended. |
Exploratory testing is a type of software testing approach that involves exploring the software without relying on pre-written test cases. Instead, testers use their knowledge and experience to guide their testing and actively explore the software to find defects, usability issues, and potential areas of risk.
Exploratory testing is often carried out by professional testers with extensive knowledge of the software and the user's requirements. The testing process involves understanding the software, identifying high-risk areas, creating a rough plan, executing the testing, documenting the findings, reporting them to the development team, and repeating the process until the software is ready for release.
Exploratory testing is a crucial part of software testing since its objective is to uncover flaws and problems that other testing techniques could not detect. Exploratory testing is a useful strategy for guaranteeing software quality since it can reveal problems that are challenging to find with scripted testing techniques.
Boundary value analysis is a testing technique employed to assess the boundaries or limits of input values for a specific system. Its primary purpose is to test how the system performs when the input values are at their maximum, minimum, or edge values. Test cases are developed based on the input range of the system, and the chosen values for testing are the boundary values. This method enables testers to identify defects or bugs that may arise at the input range's limits. By testing these boundaries, testers can ensure that the system will function correctly under all circumstances and not just within the anticipated range. This technique is particularly useful for numerical or mathematical systems where the system's behavior can change considerably at the input range's limits. Nonetheless, it is also applicable in other systems, such as software that accepts user input or data from external sources.
Equivalence partitioning is a testing technique that categorizes input data into groups with similar functionality, making it easier to generate test cases. Input data is grouped into equivalence classes based on the system's behavior, where the input data in each class produces the same output or behavior from the system. One test case is created for each equivalence class using only one input from each class. This technique reduces the number of test cases needed while ensuring that all possible scenarios are covered. It helps identify defects or bugs that may occur in specific equivalence classes and ensures that the system behaves as expected in all scenarios
Here are the steps to use equivalence partitioning in testing:
A defect, also known as a software bug, is when the software behaves unexpectedly or produces incorrect results. It is a flaw in the software and can be identified during the testing phase or even after the software has been released.
An issue refers to any problem or concern related to the software that requires attention, but it is not necessarily a defect. These could include incomplete or missing features, performance problems, usability issues, compatibility problems, or any other aspect of the software that needs improvement. Issues can occur and be found at any point in the software development life cycle, including planning, development, testing, and even post-release.
Defect priority refers to the level of significance or urgency assigned to a defect based on its severity and impact on the system. The priority helps developers determine which defects should be addressed first and which can be deferred.
Defect priority is generally determined based on the following criteria:
Based on these criteria, the development team assigns a priority level to the defect. High-priority defects are usually addressed first, followed by medium-priority and low-priority defects. Defect priority is crucial in defect management as it ensures that critical issues are resolved promptly, minimizing the risk of significant impact on the system or users.
Defect severity refers to the degree of impact a software defect has on the normal functioning of the system or application. It is determined by evaluating how much the defect affects the system's ability to meet its requirements. Organizations or projects may use various severity levels, ranging from low to high. The most common severity levels include critical, major, minor, and cosmetic. Critical defects are those that cause the system to crash or result in significant data loss, requiring immediate attention. Major defects affect system functionality and prevent the system from performing important functions, while minor defects only cause inconvenience to the user. Cosmetic defects are those that only affect the system's appearance or formatting without impacting its functionality.
To determine the severity of a defect, testers and developers consider different factors such as the impact on system performance, the number of affected users, the frequency of occurrence, and the importance of the affected functionality. Once a severity level is assigned, the defect is prioritized for resolution, focusing on critical defects first and then on minor issues.
A test log is a vital record that stores information about the activities carried out during software testing. It's a chronological document that captures events, actions, and results during the testing phase, and it's employed for documentation, analysis, and reporting purposes.
The test log consists of critical details such as the test case or scenario executed, date and time of each testing activity, the actual test outcome, defects or bugs discovered, the corrective measures taken, and other relevant information such as test environment specifics, configuration, and test data employed.
A test log is useful in several ways during software testing, such as documentation, analysis, reporting, and debugging purposes. It enables project managers, developers, and other members of the development team to monitor the testing progress, report test coverage, and communicate discovered defects or bugs to stakeholders. It also provides a reference point for debugging and troubleshooting efforts and serves as a historical record of testing activities for compliance and auditing purposes.
A test report is defined as a document that presents the results of a software testing process and providing the detailed information about the application or system that underwent testing, the executed test cases, and the outcomes.
This is the following information that test report contains:
A test summary report is defined as a document that provides a summary of the testing activities performed on a project or system. It is usually created at the end of the testing phase and records the testing process and results.
It generally contains an introduction, test environment, test strategy, test execution, a summary of results, a conclusion and recommendations, and appendices. In the introduction it contains the objective of the testing, test environment describes the testing environment which includes the hardware and software configuration used, test data, or any other resources required for testing, test strategy defines the approach of the testing, test execution provides the overview of the testing activities, summary of results provide testing outcomes, including the pass/fail status of tests, the number of defects identified, in conclusion, and recommendations section is very crucial it provide insights into the quality of the system, and recommend any actions needed to improve the quality of the system and appendices is used to add a additional information which is relevant to testing such as test cases, defects logs and performance reports.
A test script refers to a sequence of instructions, written in a programming language, that enables the automation of testing procedures. In order to check an application's functionality, performance, and dependability, it replicates user actions and interactions with the system. The input values, anticipated results, and actual results are generally included in test scripts, which are written in computer languages like Python, Java, and Ruby. They are repeatable, allowing for uniform testing, and they can also be used to identify and diagnose software problems, as well as track changes over time.
These are the major steps involved in a test script which include developing the script, executing it either manually or with a testing tool, analyzing the results, and reporting them to the development team. Using a test script can automate testing, ensure consistency, and improve software quality. To develop the script you need to create a test script that outlines the specific test cases that need to be executed. Once the test script has been developed, it can be executed by a testing tool or manually by a tester, after the test script has been executed, the results need to be analyzed to determine whether the software passed or failed the test. The final step is to report the test results, including any issues found during testing, to the development team,the development team will then work to address the issues and fix any defects found during testing.
A test bed is a specialized environment, which can be physical or virtual, that is dedicated to testing, evaluating, and validating new technologies, software, hardware, or processes prior to their release or deployment. For instance, when testing a software application on a desktop computer, the test bed would include the specific operating system, browser version, and other necessary software that the application is designed to run on. Test beds enable researchers, engineers, and developers to assess the performance, functionality, compatibility, and reliability of their products or systems under simulated real-world conditions. They find extensive use in various fields such as aerospace, telecommunications, automotive, software development, and military applications.
Setting up a test bed involves multiple steps that depend on the technology, software, hardware, or process being tested and the testing objectives. Typically, the process starts with defining scopes and objectives of the testing, followed by identifying and installing the appropriate equipment and software to create the ideal testing environment. Once the test bed is set up, test cases are created and executed evaluate the system or product under test's performance, functionality, compatibility, and dependability. The results are analyzed, and any necessary changes or upgrades to the test bed or system under test are implemented. This testing procedure is performed until the desired level of performance and dependability is met. To assure success, rigorous planning, configuration, and testing are required.
A test harness is a group of software tools used to automate the testing of software systems or applications. It enables for test execution, data collection and analysis, and reporting on overall test coverage and efficacy. The harness may include tools for setting test environments, generating test data, and evaluating test findings. Debugging and profiling tools may also be included to identify defects in the software. Test harnesses are commonly used in software development and testing processes, particularly in Agile and DevOps techniques, where automated testing is critical to the CI/CD pipeline. They contribute to the comprehensive testing, dependability, and high quality of software products.
It is commonly used to do various forms of testing, including unit testing, integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing. The harness can be adjusted to simulate the actual production environment, ensuring that testing are carried out under realistic conditions.
Aspects | Black-box testing | Grey-box testing |
---|---|---|
Knowledge of system | It is a method of software testing where the tester has no knowledge of the internal workings or code of the software system being tested. | It is a method of software testing where the tester has partial knowledge of the internal workings or code of the software system being tested. |
Test coverage | Focuses on Functional Testing and non-functional aspects such as performance and security | Can include Functional testing and white-box testing techniques |
Test design | Test cases are designed based on the system requirements and expected behavior | Test cases are designed based on understanding of the internal workings of the |
Access | In this testing tester only has access to the inputs and outputs of the software system and tests the system based on the specifications and requirements of the system. | Here, the tester has access to some internal information about the system, such as the database schema or internal data flows, which can be used to design more efficient and targeted tests. |
Purpose | The purpose of black-box testing is to verify that the system is functioning correctly, without any knowledge of how it is implemented. | Grey-box testing can be used to identify defects that may not be visible through black-box testing, while still maintaining an external perspective. |
Unit testing and integration testing are two different types of software testing that function differently in the software development process.
Load testing | Stress testing |
---|---|
Testing the system's ability to handle normal and expected user traffic, by simulating the expected workload on the system. | Testing the system's ability to handle extreme conditions and unexpected user traffic, by simulating the workload beyond the expected capacity of the system. |
Checks if the system can handle the expected volume of users or transactions without performance degradation or failures. | Checks if the system can handle the expected volume of users or transactions without performance degradation or failures. |
Load testing is typically performed to determine the performance and scalability of the system, and to identify bottlenecks or issues under normal usage conditions. | Stress testing is performed to determine the system's stability, and to identify how it handles high load or resource constraints, and whether it fails gracefully or crashes under extreme conditions. |
Load testing is usually performed using a predefined workload, with a gradual increase in the number of users or transactions to reach the expected capacity of the system. | Stress testing is usually performed using a sudden and large increase in the workload to test the system's limits and observe how it reacts under stress. |
The purpose of load testing is to discover performance issues and bottlenecks under expected usage scenarios and optimize the system for maximum throughput and efficiency. | Stress testing is used to determine a system's breaking point, confirm that it can recover gracefully from errors or crashes, and guarantee high availability and resilience. |
Load testing is often used for testing web and mobile applications, database systems, and network infrastructure. | Stress testing is often used for testing critical systems such as air traffic control, financial systems, and healthcare systems. |
Parameter | Acceptance Testing | Regression testing |
---|---|---|
Define | acceptance testing refers to the process of using automated tests to verify that a software application meets the requirements and expectations of the end-users. | Regression testing is a type of software testing that involves verifying that changes made to a software application do not have any unintended side effects on its existing functionality. |
Purpose | The purpose of acceptance testing in Selenium is to validate that the software application meets the requirements and specifications set forth by the stakeholders, and that it provides a good user experience | The purpose of regression testing is to ensure that the software application continues to work as expected after modifications have been made to it. |
Timing | It is usually conducted towards the end of the software development life cycle. | It can be conducted after every modification or enhancement made in the software. |
Execution | It is performed by end-users or business analysts who are not part of the development team | It is performed by the development team or QA team. |
Results | The results determined that whether the software is ready for delivery to the customer or end-user. | The results ensure that the changes made in the software have not impacted the existing functionality. |
Test cases | Test cases are based on user stories, requirements, and business use cases. | Test cases are based on the existing functionalities and are written to check the impact of the changes made in the software. |
Dynamic testing and static testing are two different types of software testing techniques.
Dynamic testing is a software testing technique that involves executing the code or software application to identify defects or errors, It is also known as validation testing or live testing whereas static testing is a testing technique that examines the code or software application without actually executing it. It is also known as dry-run testing or verification testing.
Parameters | Dynamic testing | Static testing |
---|---|---|
Purpose | To detect defects or errors that are discoverable only through code execution. | To uncover defects or errors in the code prior to its execution. |
Performed | Once the software development is complete. | In the initial phases of the development cycle. |
Techniques | Executing the software application using various test cases. | Conducting manual or automated code or software application review and analysis. |
Types of errors detected | Issues such as bugs, errors, and performance limitations. | Coding errors, syntax errors, and logical errors. |
A requirement and a specification are two different documents that serve different purposes in the software development lifecycle.
Requirement | Specification | |
---|---|---|
Definition | A statement that describes what the software should do or how it should behave. | A detailed description of how the software should be designed and implemented. |
Purpose | Captures the needs and expectations of stakeholders. | Guides the development and testing process. |
Level of detail | High-level and not specific to implementation details. | Detailed and specific to the implementation of the software. |
Content | It outlines both the functional and non-functional aspects of the software's requirements. | Describes the architecture, interface design, data structures, algorithms, and testing criteria of the software. |
Use | Used to validate the functionality of the software. | Used to ensure that the software is designed and implemented correctly. |
Creation | Created during the requirements gathering phase. | Created after the requirements have been defined. |
A test closure report is a document prepared at the end of a testing phase or project to summarize the testing activities and results. The purpose of this report is to provide stakeholders with a comprehensive overview of the testing process, outcomes, and recommendations for future improvements.
The test closure report typically contains the following information:
A defect management tool is software used by software development and testing teams to manage and track defects, also known as bugs or issues, identified during the software testing process. These tools provide a centralized platform for capturing, documenting, prioritizing, tracking, and resolving defects.
Defect management tools typically offer the following functionalities:
White-box testing and grey-box testing are two types of software testing techniques that are used to assess the functionality and quality of software systems. Here is the differences between them :
White-box testing | Grey-box testing |
---|---|
The tester has full knowledge of the internal workings of the software system, including its code, architecture, and implementation details. | The tester has partial knowledge of the internal workings of the software system, which may include some information about its architecture, design, or implementation, but not the complete source code. |
White-box testing's goals include finding and fixing software code flaws as well as making sure the software system satisfies all functional and performance criteria. | In order to discover potential problems with the software system's functionality and performance, grey-box testing simulates how the software system would behave in real-world situations. |
White-box testing is a type of structural testing that is used to test the internal structure and design of the software system. | The objective of grey-box testing is to simulate the behavior of the software system under real-world conditions and to identify potential issues related to its functionality and performance. |
White-box testing is useful for testing complex software systems where a deep understanding of the internal workings of the system is necessary. | Grey-box testing is useful for testing software systems where a partial understanding of the internal workings of the system is sufficient. |
Examples of white-box testing techniques include code coverage analysis, path testing, and statement testing. | Examples of grey-box testing techniques include data-driven testing, regression testing, and performance testing. |
In a software development team, a test manager's main duty is to supervise the testing procedure and make sure the software product complies with the necessary quality standards. This includes developing test strategies and plans, managing the testing team, collaborating with other stakeholders, monitoring and reporting on testing progress, and enforcing quality standards. Additionally, the test manager plays an important role in documenting and tracking the testing activities by creating and maintaining comprehensive records. These records are critical for monitoring progress, identifying issues, and ensuring that the testing aligns with the project goals and objectives. Overall, the test manager is essential in delivering a high-quality software product by leading and overseeing the testing process.
The role of a test lead in a software development team is essential in maintaining the quality of the software product under development. The primary duty of a test lead is to oversee the testing process and collaborate with the development team to guarantee that the software satisfies the necessary quality standards. The responsibilities of a test lead include devising a comprehensive test plan that specifies the testing strategy, schedule, and methodologies, executing tests to ensure conformity to the plan, supervising the development of automated test scripts for repetitive testing tasks, managing defects detected during testing and ensuring their resolution, communicating testing progress to the development team, project managers, and stakeholders, and managing the testing team by delegating tasks and providing support and guidance. Ultimately, the test lead's role is crucial in ensuring the software development process is efficient and effective by delivering high-quality software.
Manual Testing Interview Questions
Note : We have compiled all Manual Testing Interview Questions List for you in a template format. Feel free to comment on it. Check it out now!!
A test engineer is an integral member of a software development team responsible for ensuring that the software product is thoroughly tested and meets quality standards. Collaborating with developers and other team members, a test engineer is involved in designing, developing, and executing test plans and test cases. They use various testing techniques and tools to create comprehensive test suites that cover all aspects of the software product. Once the tests are executed, test engineers analyze the results to identify defects and report them to the development team. In order to make sure that the testing efforts are in line with the project goals and objectives, they additionally collaborate closely with developers, project managers, and other stakeholders. By doing so, they ensure that the software product meets the quality standards and requirements by conducting thorough testing and identifying and addressing all defects and issues before the release of the product.
Test metrics and test measurement are related concepts in software testing, but there is a subtle difference between them.
Test metrics | Test measurement |
---|---|
Test metrics are quantitative values used to measure the effectiveness of the testing process. | Test measurement is the process of collecting and analyzing data to determine the effectiveness of the testing process. |
Test metrics are quantitative values that provide insights into the quality of the testing process, including metrics like defect count and test coverage. | Test measurement entails gathering data to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the testing process, such as measuring the testing duration and the number of identified defects. |
Test metrics provide a snapshot of the testing process at a specific point in time. | Test measurement provides ongoing feedback on the effectiveness of the testing process throughout the software development lifecycle. |
Test metrics are used to track progress and identify areas for improvement in the testing process. | Test measurement helps to identify areas for improvement in the testing process by analyzing data and identifying trends. |
Defect density, test coverage, and test execution time are a few examples of test metrics. | Examples of test measurement include defect trend analysis, test progress tracking, and test effectiveness analysis. |
A test case template is a pre-designed document or form that outlines the key elements and details that should be included in a test case. It provides a standardized format for documenting test cases to ensure consistency and completeness across the testing process. A typical test case template includes fields or sections for identifying the test case, describing the test scenario, defining the test steps and expected results, and capturing the actual results and any defects found during the test execution.
A test case template typically contains the following information:
A test scenario and a test suite are both important components of software testing. Here is differences between them :
Test scenario | Test suite |
---|---|
A test scenario is a single test condition or test case. | A test suite is a collection of test scenarios or test cases. |
Test scenarios are designed to test specific functionalities or features of the system or application. | Test suites are designed to test a group of functionalities or features that are related to each other. |
Outlines the steps to be executed and the expected results for a particular use case or scenario. | Consists of multiple test scenarios grouped together for a specific purpose. |
Created based on the software requirements | Test suites are created based on the software test plan or project requirements. |
Designed to identify defects or errors in the software and ensure that it meets the specified requirements. | Designed to validate the overall quality of the software and identify any issues or defects that may have been missed during individual testing. |
Typically executed individually | Executed as a group |
Used to ensure that all possible test cases are covered | Used to ensure that all components of the software are tested thoroughly. |
A test case and a test script are both important components of software testing, but they differ in their level of detail and purpose.
Test case | Test script |
---|---|
A specific set of instructions or conditions used to test a particular aspect of the software | A detailed set of instructions written in a programming or scripting language to automate the execution of a test case |
Typically includes the steps to be executed, the expected results, and any pre- or post-conditions required for the test to be successful | Includes commands that simulate user actions or input |
Designed to validate that the software meets the specified requirements and identify any defects or errors that may exist | Used to automate testing and reduce manual effort |
Typically created by a manual tester | Typically created by an automation engineer. |
Can be executed manually or through automation | Only executed through automation |
Primarily used for functional and regression testing | Primarily used for regression and performance testing |
Helps identify defects or errors in the software | Helps reduce the time and effort required for testing |
The test log and test report have distinct purposes and are utilized at varying phases in software testing.
Test log | Test report |
---|---|
A test log is a detailed record of all the testing activities and results executed during the testing phase. | A test report summarizes the testing activities and results, including recommendations and conclusions drawn from the testing phase. |
Includes details such as the date and time of the test, the tester's name, the test scenario, the test outcome, any defects found, and any other relevant information. | The test report comprises high-level information regarding the testing phase, such as the testing objectives, testing scope, testing approach, and testing outcomes. |
The test log keeps a consideration of every testing activity in chronological order and can be used later to monitor how the testing phase is progressing. | The test report comprises high-level information regarding the testing phase, such as the testing objectives, testing scope, testing approach, and testing outcomes. |
Used to track the progress of testing and provide documentation of completed testing. | Used to inform stakeholders such as project managers, developers, and customers on the outcomes of testing. |
It assists in the identification of patterns, trends, and difficulties that may be used to improve the testing process. | It assists stakeholders in immediately understanding the testing results and making informed decisions. |
QA teams, developers, and testers frequently employ this technique. | Project managers, programmers, and clients typically use it. |
Ad-hoc testing and exploratory testing are two different testing approaches. Ad-hoc testing is a type of informal testing where the tester tests the software without any plan or strategy, whereas exploratory testing is a structured and systematic approach where the tester tests the software based on his/her understanding of the software.
Here are the differences between the two:
A requirement and a user story are two different concepts in software development. Here are the differences between them :
Requirements | User story |
---|---|
Defines a specific feature or functionality that the software should have | Describes a specific user need or goal that the software should fulfill |
Typically written in a formal format, such as a document or a specification | Typically written in an informal format, such as a brief narrative or a card |
Usually defined by stakeholders, such as product owners or business analysts | Usually defined collaboratively by the development team, product owner, and stakeholders |
Frequently focuses on the software's technical components. | It frequently focuses on the needs and end-user experience |
Usually includes a set of acceptance criteria that must be met for the requirement to be considered complete | Usually includes a set of acceptance criteria that must be met the user story to be considered complete |
It is frequently applied in conventional, plan-driven development techniques | Frequently used in agile development approaches such as Scrum or Kanban. |
Can be more rigid and less flexible to change | Can be more adaptable and subject to change based on user feedback |
Can be more difficult to understand for non-technical stakeholders | Can be easier to understand for non-technical stakeholders, as they are written in a more user-friendly and accessible format |
A test bed matrix is a document that outlines the various hardware, software, and network configurations that will be used to test a software system. It is a planning tool that helps testing teams to ensure that they cover all possible combinations of environments and configurations that the software may encounter in the real world.
The purpose of a test bed matrix is to identify and document the specific combinations of hardware, software, and network configurations that will be used to test the software. Each configuration is tested to ensure that the software functions correctly and as expected in each scenario. Identifying and testing multiple combinations of environments and configurations can improve test coverage, allowing testing teams to ensure that the software is thoroughly tested and can handle any scenario it may encounter. Additionally, this method lowers risk by spotting flaws that might go undetected during testing in a single configuration that can then be addressed to lessen the possibility of problems arising in actual use. Furthermore, by using a test bed matrix, testing teams can ensure that they are testing the software in the most efficient way possible, resulting in saved time and resources, and increasing the likelihood of delivering the software on time and within budget.
A defect in software testing refers to a flaw or imperfection in the software that could cause it to behave in an unintended way, also known as a bug. It could be caused by an error in the code, a miscommunication in requirements, or a mistake in design while a failure is the actual behavior of the software when it does not meet the expected outcome, which is the manifestation of the defect in the real world. One or more defects in the software could lead to a failure.
To illustrate the difference between a defect and a failure, consider a calculator software that is expected to perform basic arithmetic operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. If the software is designed to perform the multiplication operation but performs the division operation instead, it is considered a defect. On the other hand, if a user enters two numbers to multiply, but the calculator returns the result of dividing the two numbers, this is a failure.
A test objective is a specific, measurable statement that describes what is to be accomplished by a particular test. It is typically derived from a requirement or a user story and outlines what aspect of the software system is to be tested and what the expected outcome is. Test objectives are used to guide the testing effort and ensure that the testing is focused and efficient. A test goal, on the other hand, is a higher-level statement that describes the overall purpose or aim of the testing effort. It is often used to communicate the testing objectives and priorities to stakeholders and team members. Test goals are broader and less specific than test objectives and can include statements about the quality or reliability of the software system being tested, the testing approach or methodology, or the timeline or budget for the testing effort.
In software testing, a test approach and a test methodology are often used interchangeably, but they have different meanings.
A defect closure report is a document that is prepared by a software testing team at the end of the defect resolution process. It provides an overview of the defects that were identified during testing, the steps taken to resolve them, and the results of the testing performed to verify that the defects have been fixed.
It contains information related to the defect, its root cause, the actions taken to fix it, and the results of the testing performed after the fix. Specifically, a defect closure report typically includes:
A test plan is an essential document in manual testing that provides a roadmap for the testing process. Its primary objective is to outline the approach, scope, objectives, and activities that will be undertaken to guarantee the quality of the software application being tested. A comprehensive test plan should establish the testing objectives, identify the testing environment and tools, specify the testing activities and test cases to be executed, describe the testing procedures and techniques, and define the roles and responsibilities of the testing team members. By doing so, the test plan helps ensure a thorough, systematic, and efficient testing process that reduces the likelihood of defects or errors in the software. Additionally, the test plan enables consistency and repeatability of the testing process, making it easier to track progress and report on results.
Black box testing and White box testing are two different software testing methodologies that differ in their approach to testing. The main difference between them lies in the level of knowledge of the internal workings of the software application being tested.
In black box testing, the tester does not know the software application's internal workings. This method involves testing the functionality of the software system against the requirements and specifications, often focusing on the user interface and overall functionality. In contrast, white box testing involves the tester having full knowledge of the software application's internal workings. The approach focuses on the internal structures and implementation of the software and tests it against the design and architecture. White box testing is commonly used for testing the code quality, security, and performance of the software.
Here are some key differences between black box testing and white box testing:
Black box testing | White box testing |
---|---|
Based on external expectations | Based on internal structure and design |
Focuses on functional requirements | Focuses on code structure, logic, and implementation |
Does not require knowledge of internal code | Requires knowledge of internal code and implementation |
Test from the end user perspective | Test from the developer perspective |
Test cases are driven from the specifications , requirement or use cases | Test cases are driven from source code, design documents, or architectural diagrams |
Emphasize on the software behavior or functionality | Emphasize on the software code quality and structure |
Usually performed by independent tester | Usually performed by developers. |
Less time | More time |
Usability testing and user acceptance testing (UAT) are two different types of testing in software development. The main differences between these two types of testing are explained below:
Usability testing | Acceptance testing |
---|---|
This test evaluates the usability and overall user experience of a software application. | Checks whether the software application fits the end-users' expectations and needs. |
Determines how successfully the intended audience can use the software product. | Determines whether the software is suitable for the users |
A process that takes place during the design and development stages of the software development lifecycle | Carried out throughout the testing and acceptance stages of the software development lifecycle |
Testing a wide range of user interactions with the software application, including navigation, user interface, and general functioning | Involves evaluating a software program against a set of acceptance criteria that have been determined in advance. |
Usually conducted with a small group of representative users | Usually conducted with a larger group of end-users or stakeholders |
Involves collecting qualitative and quantitative data through various testing techniques such as surveys, interviews, and observation | Involves validating the software application against specific user requirements or user stories |
Depending on the testing objectives, it can be performed in a lab or in the field. | Often carried out in a regulated testing environment |
Results can be used to enhance the software application's user interface and user experience. | Results can be utilized to confirm whether the software application satisfies the demands and expectations of the end users. |
Test estimation is essential in software testing because it assists project managers in planning and allocating resources, effectively budgeting, and estimating the time required to perform testing operations. It ensures that the testing process is appropriately managed, that risks are detected, and that the expectations of stakeholders are met. Accurate test estimation aids in the efficient allocation of resources, time management, cost management, risk management, and stakeholder management. It enables project managers to make informed decisions, prioritise testing operations, and assure project completion on schedule and under budget.
Test reporting is important in software testing for the following reasons:
Test reporting ensures effective communication, documentation, transparency, informed decision-making, and continuous improvement in software testing.
Dynamic testing and manual testing are both types of software testing, but they differ in their approach and methodology. Here is the differences between dynamic testing and manual testing:
Aspect | Dynamic testing | Manual testing |
---|---|---|
Definition | Testing the software during runtime by executing the code. | Testing the software manually by a human tester. |
Automation | Can be automated or manual | Always manual |
Types of test | Includes functional, performance, security, and usability testing | Includes functional, regression, and user acceptance testing |
Execution | Uses tools and software to simulate and emulate real-world scenarios | Relies on human testers to follow test scripts and execute test cases |
Accuracy | Highly accurate and replicable | May vary based on the human tester's skills and experience |
Speed | Can be faster due to automation and repeatable test cases | Can be slower due to the need for human intervention and manual test execution |
Test coverage | It is capable of addressing a wide array of scenarios and testing scenarios. | limited by the capacity along with the expertise of the human tester |
Scope of testing | Can test complex scenarios and simulate real-world usage | Limited to the test cases specified in the test plan |
Cost | Can be more cost-effective due to automation and faster execution | May be more expensive due to the need for manual labor and time-consuming execution |
Debugging | Can detect and identify defects more quickly and efficiently | May require more time and effort to identify and resolve defects |
Functional testing and regression testing are both important types of software testing, but they differ in their focus and scope. Here's how they differ:
The emphasis is on validating the software's functionality to ensure compliance with defined requirements. It examines and evaluates individual functions, features, and modules of the software. Generally conducted prior to or during the development cycle to detect defects at an early stage. It can be executed through manual testing or by utilizing automation tools. The primary objective is to verify that the software functions as intended, with all features and functions operating correctly.
The focus is on testing the software post-modifications to ensure the absence of new defects and the continued functionality of existing features. It encompasses testing the entire software system or a substantial portion of it. Generally conducted following software changes, including bug fixes or the addition of new features, to verify that the alterations have not adversely affected the existing functionality. Frequently executed using automation tools to enhance efficiency and reduce the likelihood of human errors. The primary goal is to ascertain that software changes do not result in regression or unintended consequences.
A traceability matrix is a vital tool in software testing that offers several benefits. Its importance in software testing can be summarized as follows:
Regression testing involves retesting a software application to confirm that previous defects have been resolved, and new changes have not introduced new issues.Test coverage is critical in regression testing, as it measures the degree to which a set of test cases covers the functionality of a system. The higher the test coverage, the more thorough the testing process, and the greater the chances of identifying defects.
A comprehensive test coverage is necessary to ensure that all areas of the system are adequately tested, and any modifications made to the software do not adversely affect its existing functionality. By examining the test coverage, testers can pinpoint which areas of the application require further testing, and add more test cases to provide complete coverage. A higher level of test coverage can also enhance the probability of detecting defects and other issues, making it easier to identify and resolve problems before they escalate.
A test plan is a critical document that outlines the testing activities' scope, objectives, and approach, including regression testing. A well-defined test plan for regression testing should include the areas of the software application to be tested, the required hardware and software configurations, the testing techniques and tools to be used, the test cases to be executed, the regression test suite, and the testing schedule, timelines, and milestones. The test plan ensures that the testing process is thorough, efficient, and cost-effective.
Test execution and test evaluation are two critical activities in the software testing process. Here's the difference between the two:
In software testing, test automation is a significant process that involves utilizing tools and scripts to automate repetitive and time-consuming testing tasks. This is vital as it enhances testing efficiency, precision, and accelerates the testing process while detecting defects earlier and saving costs. Test automation reduces the time and effort required to execute tests, ensuring that the same tests are executed consistently and generating more accurate test results. It also contributes to reducing the time-to-market for software products, giving companies a competitive edge, and minimizes the costs of correcting defects. Overall, test automation is an essential aspect of software testing, which ensures that software products meet the necessary quality standards.
Test Plan | Test summary reports | |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Outlines the approach, scope, objectives, and activities of testing. | Provides a summary of the testing activities, results, and metrics after the completion of testing. |
Define | Defines what will be tested, the features, functions, and components to be tested, and the test environment. | Summarizes the testing effort, including the features, functions, and components tested, and the test environment used. |
contents | Test objectives, test strategies, test schedule, test deliverables, test environment requirements, test entry/exit criteria, and risks and contingencies. | Overview of the testing performed, test coverage, test results, defects found and fixed, and recommendations. |
Audience | Testing team members, project stakeholders, and other relevant parties involved in the testing process. | Project stakeholders, management, development team, and other stakeholders are interested in the testing outcomes. |
Timing | Created before the start of testing as a planning document. | Created after the completion of testing as a summary and evaluation document. |
Focus | Emphasizes on the approach, strategy, and details of the testing activities to be performed. | Emphasizes the testing outcomes, metrics, and recommendations based on the testing results. |
Documentation | Provides guidelines and instructions for testers to conduct the testing process. | Provides a summary and evaluation of the testing process, outcomes, and recommendations. |
A test environment matrix is a document that outlines the hardware, software, network, and other infrastructure components required for different test environments in software testing. It provides details such as environment names, descriptions, hardware and software configurations, network setups, test data requirements, dependencies, pre-condition setups, availability, and maintenance and support information.
The test environment matrix is used in testing to plan and set up the appropriate test environments, ensure consistency in configurations, facilitate collaboration among team members, aid in reproducing test scenarios or issues, and support scalability when multiple testers or teams are involved. It improves the efficiency and reliability of testing by providing a structured overview of the necessary environments and ensuring consistent and controlled testing processes.
Test case | Test suite | |
---|---|---|
Defination | A specific set of inputs, preconditions, and expected outputs for testing a particular functionality or scenario. | A collection or group of test cases that are executed together as a unit. |
Purpose | To validate a specific requirement or functionality of the software. | To validate multiple functionalities or test scenarios as a whole. |
Scope | Focuses on a single test scenario or functionality. | Encompasses multiple test cases or scenarios. |
Granularity | Granular level of testing, addressing specific scenarios or conditions. | Broad level of testing, combining various test cases to achieve a larger objective. |
Management | Typically managed and maintained individually. | Managed and maintained as a unified entity. |
Reusablities | Can be reused across multiple test suites or projects. | Can be reused across different test runs or iterations. |
ExecutionTime | Usually executed quickly, within a short duration. | Execution time varies depending on the number of test cases in the suite. |
Reporting | Results reported individually for each test case. | Results reported collectively for the entire test suite. |
A test case is a methodical procedure used to assess whether a specific feature or functionality of a software application is operating correctly. It involves executing a set of actions or steps to validate if the application behaves as intended under various conditions. To develop a test case, a structured approach must be followed to ensure that it covers all possible scenarios associated with the feature being tested. This includes identifying the objective of the test case, the inputs or conditions to be tested, the expected outcome, and the actual steps that the tester will take to perform the test. Additional notes or information that may be helpful for the tester can also be included. As an example, a test case for a login functionality might involve verifying that a user can log in successfully to the application by entering valid username and password and being redirected to the homepage, among other criteria.
Manual testing is a software testing technique in which testers manually execute predefined test cases and explore programs in order to detect faults and provide feedback to developers. This process might be laborious and time-consuming, but it is required to ensure software quality.
Instead of requiring manual intervention, automated testing employs software tools to automatically carry out test cases. It is frequently employed for activities like performance testing, regression testing, and load testing. Automated testing is more efficient and faster than manual testing, but it involves knowledge of scripting, programming, and automation technologies.
Both human and automated testing have benefits and drawbacks, and they are frequently used in tandem in software development projects. Manual testing is ideal for user experience testing and exploratory testing, whereas automated testing is better suited for repetitive and time-consuming testing activities. The testing approach chosen is determined by the project requirements, available resources, and timeframe.
Testing is essential in software development because it identifies errors and issues early in the development process, allowing them to be rectified before the product is released to the market. Additionally, testing contributes to the enhancement of the software's overall quality and dependability, which may lead to more satisfied and steadfast customers. By identifying flaws early and preventing the need for expensive repair and maintenance later on, testing can also assist to lower the overall cost of software development. However, testing is important for ensuring that the software product complies with the needs and criteria specified by the client or end user, which is crucial for producing a successful product.
The goal of the Test plan document is to provide a complete and comprehensive overview of the testing strategy, tactics, and activities that will be carried out during the testing phase of a software development project. It describes the testing activities' scope, objectives, and timetables, as well as the roles and duties of the testing team members. The Test Plan document includes covers the test environment, test data, and testing tools that will be utilized, as well as the test cases and processes that will be carried out to guarantee that the software meets the requirements and quality standards. In order to make sure that everyone is aware of the testing strategy and their individual roles and responsibilities, the Test Plan document also acts as a communication tool between the testing team and other stakeholders, including project managers, developers, and business analysts.
Regression testing is a software testing approach used to ensure that changes to an application or system have not created any new bugs or rendered any functioning that was previously working improperly. To make sure the system still performs as expected after modifications, it requires running the test cases that were previously conducted on the system again.
Regression testing is performed after a change is made to a software system, such as a bug fix, enhancement, or new feature. It helps to ensure that the changes made have not caused any unintended side effects that may have impacted the functionality of the system. It is performed during the software testing phase of the software development life cycle, and it can be automated or executed manually. It is an important part of the overall software testing process to ensure that the system remains reliable and stable and that the quality of the system is maintained over time.
Exploratory testing is an agile approach to software testing that allows testers to explore the software application while simultaneously designing and executing test cases. It is especially useful for new or complex software systems where traditional scripted testing may not be sufficient. Unlike traditional testing, exploratory testing does not require predefined test plans or scripts, and it is conducted by experienced testers who use their intuition and creativity to find defects that may not have been identified otherwise.
The primary goal of exploratory testing is to rapidly and efficiently find defects and issues in software applications, and it can be utilized at any point in the software development life cycle. It is especially useful in the early stages of the development process, such as prototype or design, when needs are vague or continually changing. Exploratory testing can also be combined with scripted testing to ensure a more thorough and successful testing procedure.
The black box testing method is used to test software systems without any prior knowledge of their internal structure, design, or code. This technique is named after the concept of a black box, which is a device that performs a specific function without revealing its inner workings.
Black box testing is performed by a tester who has no knowledge of the system's internal workings. The tester uses various testing techniques to input data and examine the system's responses to ensure that it behaves as expected.
The following are some common techniques used in black box testing:
Black box testing is effective in finding defects that may not be apparent from examining the system's internal structure. However, it does not provide insight into the system's internal workings or architecture, which is important for debugging and maintenance purposes.
White box testing is an approach used in software testing that involves analyzing the internal structure and workings of a software application to confirm its functionality. This testing method is sometimes referred to as structural testing, clear box testing, or transparent box testing. White box testing's major objective is to check the code, architecture, and design of the software application to make sure it complies with the necessary quality standards and specifications. It analyzes the internal workings of the software to find potential flaws and identify areas for development in order to improve the product's overall quality.
It is often carried out by testers or software engineers who have access to the source code and are acquainted with the inner workings of the application. To carry out white box testing, the tester typically follows a series of steps, including test planning, test environment setup, test case execution, test coverage analysis, debugging, and regression testing. Testers use various techniques in white box testing, such as statement coverage, branch coverage, path coverage, and condition coverage. The aim of these techniques is to ensure that all parts of the code have been thoroughly tested.
Two commonly used software testing techniques are equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis. Equivalence partitioning involves dividing input data into groups where all values in each group are considered equivalent, thus reducing the number of test cases required. For example, if a system accepts values between 1 and 100, testers could divide the input values into three groups: values less than 1, values between 1 and 100, and values greater than 100. Testers could then select representative values from each group to ensure that the system behaves correctly for all input values.
Boundary value analysis complements equivalence partitioning by testing the system's behavior at the boundaries of each group, where errors are more likely to occur. For instance, if the system accepts values between 1 and 100, testers would test the system's behavior for values of 1, 100, and values near the boundaries, such as 2, 99, 101, and 0. This technique helps to ensure that the system handles values at the edge of each group correctly.
In software testing, a defect refers to an issue or flaw that results in the system not working as intended. Defects can arise at any point in the software development life cycle, ranging from gathering requirements to coding and testing. Testers report defects by identifying them and documenting them with enough detail to help the development team understand the problem. Defects are documented in a tracking tool, including steps to reproduce the issue, severity and priority, and relevant screenshots or logs. Testers assign the defect to the responsible person and verify the fix after the development team resolves it. A standard defect reporting process enhances software quality and reduces development costs.
In software testing, severity and priority are two different attributes that are used to classify defects.
Attributes | Severity | Priority |
---|---|---|
Definition | The extent of impact that a defect has on the system' functionality | The level of urgency in fixing a defect |
Measures | It measures how severe the problem is and how it affects the user or the system | It measures how important the defect is and how soon it needs to be fixed |
Importance | Helps to determine the severity of the issue, the extent of testing required, and the impact on the user experience | Helps to prioritize defects based on their urgency, allocate resources, and meet users' needs |
Decision making | Determines how much attention a defect requires and how much effort is required to fix it | Determines the order in which defects should be addressed, based on their impact and urgency, and the available resources |
Relationship | Severity is independent of priority | Priority depends on severity but also takes into account other factors such as the users' needs and the impact on the business |
In a software development project, a tester's primary duty is to guarantee that the software application or program functions as intended and complies with all requirements. In order to create test plans and test cases that cover all the intended functionality and scenarios, testers work in tandem with the development team to understand the software's design and requirements. They execute these test cases, document the results, and report any problems they discover. Testers may also perform non-functional testing, such as performance, security, and usability testing, to guarantee that the software functions well under diverse conditions and fulfills the needs of its intended users. The tester's job is essential in guaranteeing that the software is of high quality, fulfills user needs, and is free of defects that might result in customer dissatisfaction or even harm
A traceability matrix is a project management and software development tool used to ensure that all requirements are met by mapping multiple sets of requirements, including business requirements, functional requirements, and design specifications. It tracks requirements from planning to delivery, enabling project managers to identify which requirements have been implemented, are in progress, or are yet to be started. It is crucial because it enables the project to be delivered on schedule and under budget while also ensuring that the needs of the stakeholders are met. It also reduces the possibility of errors and omissions, which can result in costly delays and rework. Furthermore, the traceability matrix is a useful tool for managing change requests since it helps project managers quickly determine the impact of modifications on project requirements and timelines.
Alpha testing and beta testing are both types of software testing, but they differ in their purpose, scope, and timing.
Alpha testing is the first phase of software testing, performed by the development team in a controlled environment before the software is released to external testers or users. On the other hand, beta testing is a type of software testing conducted by a selected group of external testers or users in a real-world environment, after the software has undergone alpha testing.
Aspects | Alpha testing | Beta testing |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Identify defects and performance issues during the development | Identify issues in the real-world environment after alpha testing |
Scope | Conducted in a controlled environment by the development team | Conducted in a real-world environment by a selected group of external testers or users |
Timing | Conducted before release to external testers or users | Conducted after alpha testing and in the final stages of development before release |
Testers | Members of the development team | A selected group of external testers or users |
Feedback | Given to the development team to improve software quality | Given to the development team to improve software quality |
Focus | Ensuring that the software meets the initial set of requirements | Identifying issues that were not discovered during alpha testing |
Environment | Controlled environment | Real time environment |
System testing and acceptance testing are two important types of testing that are performed during the software development life cycle. While both types of testing are important for ensuring the quality and functionality of software systems, there are some key differences between them. These are some key differences between system testing and acceptance testing:
Aspects | System Testing | Acceptance Testing |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Verify system requirements and design | Verify that the system meets business requirements and is ready for use by end-users |
Timing | Performed before acceptance testing | Performed after system testing is complete |
Testers | Performed by development or QA team | Performed by end-users or customer representatives |
Outcome | determines system flaws and problems | confirms that the system satisfies the requirements and is fit for its intended use. |
Usability testing is a type of testing that evaluates how user-friendly and easy-to-use a software system is for its intended users. It involves observing and measuring how actual end-users interact with the system to identify any usability issues and areas for improvement. Usability testing can be performed at different stages of the software development process, such as during prototyping, design, development, and post-release maintenance.
Here is a general process for performing usability testing:
Ad-hoc testing is a testing approach where testing is performed informally and without a specific plan or methodology. It is usually done on an as-needed basis and is often driven by intuition or past experience. There may be little or no documentation of the testing process, and it is typically done manually, although some ad-hoc testing may be automated using tools like record-and-playback testing or exploratory testing while structured testing is a testing approach where testing is performed according to a specific methodology or testing framework, such as Waterfall or Agile. Testing is planned and executed systematically, with a specific goal in mind. Test cases are designed and executed in a structured way, and documentation is a key part of the process. Test cases are documented and tracked, making it easier to reproduce the testing and to ensure that all necessary tests have been performed. Structured testing may involve automation, particularly for repetitive tasks or tests that require a large amount of data or computation.
Build refers to the process of compiling source code, converting it into executable code, and linking it with required libraries and dependencies to create a software artifact such as a binary file or an installation package. The release refers to the process of deploying the software build to an environment where it can be accessed and used by end-users. Here is the difference between them :
Parameters | Build | Release |
---|---|---|
Definition | The process of compiling source code | The process of deploying software to end-users |
Purpose | To create a working version of the code | To make the software available to end-users |
Timing | Can occur multiple times a day | Occurs at the end of the development cycle |
Scope | Includes compiling and linking code | Includes testing, packaging, and deployment |
Responsibility | Generally performed by developers | Generally performed by a release manager or team |
Deliverables | An executable or code artifacts | A packaged and tested software release |
Dependencies | Dependent on successful code integration | Dependent on successful build and testing |
Risk | Limited impact on end-users | Potentially high impact on end-users if issues arise |
When developing and deploying software, two distinct environments are used: the test environment and the production environment. The primary differences between the two are as follows:
Aspects | Test environment | Production environment |
---|---|---|
Define | The test environment is where software is tested before being deployed to production. | End users use the software in the production environment. |
Objective | The objective of the test environment is to find and solve faults, bugs, or issues in software before it is distributed to end users. | The goal of the production environment is to make the software accessible to end users for regular use. |
Configuration | The test environment is usually configured to mimic the production environment but may have differences such as lower data volumes, different hardware or software configurations, or simulated users. | The production environment is configured for optimal performance, stability, and security. |
Access | The test environment is usually restricted to a limited number of users, typically developers and testers. | The production environment is accessible to a larger group of users, including customers and stakeholders. |
Data | In the test environment, test data is used to simulate real-world scenarios. | In the production environment, real data is used by end-users. |
Changes | Changes can be made more freely in the test environment, including software updates, configuration changes, and testing of new features. | Changes to the production environment are typically more limited and must go through a strict change management process to avoid impacting end-users. |
Support | Support for the test environment is typically provided by the development team | support for the production environment is usually provided by a dedicated operations team. |
A test plan, which specifies the general strategy, objectives, scope, and approach for testing a software application, is a key document in the software testing process. Its goal is to give a complete testing guide and ensure that all components of the software are adequately tested.
The test plan basically acts as a road map for the testing procedure, outlining the testing goals, dates, and objectives. It gives testers the ability to pinpoint the features that need to be evaluated, the testing's scope, and the testing techniques to use, such as functional, performance, and security testing.
The test plan also assists in the efficient allocation of testing resources, guaranteeing that all testing jobs are done on schedule.
Additionally, it helps in identifying potential risks and problems that can occur throughout the testing process and offers a strategy to reduce these risks.
Category | Code coverage | Test Coverage |
---|---|---|
Definition | Code coverage is a metric used to measure the amount of code that is executed during testing. | Test coverage is a metric used to measure the extent to which the software has been tested. |
Focus | Code coverage focuses on the codebase and aims to ensure that all code paths have been executed. | Test coverage focuses on the test cases and aims to ensure that all requirements have been tested |
Type of metric | Code coverage is a quantitative metric, measured as a percentage of code lines executed during testing. | Test coverage is both a quantitative and qualitative metric, measured as a percentage of requirements tested and the quality of the tests executed |
Goals | The goal of code coverage is to identify areas of the code that have not been tested and improve the reliability of the software. | The goal of test coverage is to ensure that all requirements have been tested and the software meets the desired quality standards. |
Coverage Tools | Code coverage can be measured using tools like JaCoCo, Cobertura, and Emma | Test coverage can be measured using tools like HP Quality Center, IBM Rational, and Microsoft Test Manager. |
Integration testing and system testing are two important types of testing performed during the software development life cycle. Here's a the differences between them :
Aspects | Integration testing | System testing |
---|---|---|
Definition | Integration testing is a method of testing where individual software modules are combined and tested together as a group to uncover any potential defects or issues that may occur during their interaction. | System testing, on the other hand, is a comprehensive testing approach that examines the entire software system as a unified entity. It entails testing all components, interfaces, and external dependencies to verify that the system satisfies its requirements and operates as intended. |
Scope | Integration testing focuses on testing the interaction between different software modules or components. | System testing focuses on testing the entire software system, including all of its components and interfaces. |
Objective | The main goal of integration testing is to identify and address any problems that arise from integrating modules, including communication errors, incorrect data transmission, and synchronization issues. | The primary objective of system testing is to ensure that the software system, in its entirety, fulfills both its functional and non-functional requirements, encompassing aspects such as performance, security, usability, and reliability. |
Approach | Integration testing can be performed using different approaches, such as top-down, bottom-up, or a combination of both. | System testing can be performed using different approaches, such as black-box, white-box, or grey-box testing, depending on the level of knowledge of the internal workings of the system. |
Timing | Integration testing is typically performed after unit testing and before system testing. | System testing is typically performed after integration testing and before acceptance testing. |
The main role of bug tracking is to provide a centralized platform for reporting, tracking, and resolving defects to ensure an efficient and effective testing process.
Bug tracking tools allow testers to report and track defects in a structured and organized manner, assign defects to team members, set priorities and severity levels, and track the status of each defect from initial report to resolution. They also provide reports and metrics to identify trends, track progress, and make data-driven decisions about the testing process. Bug tracking tools help testing teams improve their efficiency, collaboration, and communication, leading to a more thorough testing process. By ensuring that defects are properly addressed and resolved before software release, they also reduce the risk of negative impact on software functionality and user experience.
Criteria | Sanity testing | Regression testing |
---|---|---|
Purpose | To quickly check if the critical functionality of the system is working as expected after a small change or fix has been made. | To ensure that the previously working functionality of the system is not affected after a change or fix has been made. |
Scope | Narrow scope, covering only critical functionality or areas affected by recent changes. | Broad scope, covering all the features and functionalities of the software. |
Time of testing | Performed after each small change or fix to ensure the core features are still working as expected. | Performed after major changes or before the release of a new version of the software to ensure there are no new defects or issues. |
Test coverage | Basic tests to ensure the system is still functioning. | Comprehensive tests to verify that the existing functionality of the software is not affected by new changes. |
Test Environment | Limited test environment with minimum hardware and software requirements. | A comprehensive test environment that covers various platforms, operating systems, and devices. |
Static testing is a type of testing in which the code or documentation is reviewed without executing the software and dynamic testing is a type of testing in which the software is executed with a set of test cases and the behavior and performance of the system is observed and analyzed. Here is the key difference between them:
Criteria | Static testing | Dynamic testing |
---|---|---|
Goals | To find defects early in the development cycle. | To ensure that the software meets functional and performance requirements. |
Time | Performed before the software is executed. | Performed during the software execution. |
Type of analysis | Non-execution based analysis of the software artifacts such as requirements, design documents, and code. | Execution-based analysis of the software behavior such as input/output testing, user interface testing, and performance testing. |
Approach | Review, walkthrough, and inspection. | Validation and verification. |
Techniques | Static Code Analysis, Formal Verification, and Peer Review. | Unit testing, Integration testing, System testing, and Acceptance testing. |
Test documentation plays a crucial role in software testing as it provides a comprehensive record of the testing process and results. The importance of test documentation can be summarized as follows:
Agile and Waterfall are two different software development methodologies that have distinct approaches to testing. Here are some key differences between Agile and Waterfall testing:
parameters | Agile Testing | Waterfall Testing |
---|---|---|
approach | In Waterfall, testing is typically performed at the end of each phase, after the previous phase has been completed. | Agile testing is performed throughout the development cycle, with testing integrated into each sprint or iteration. |
flexibility | Agile is more flexible than Waterfall, with the ability to make changes to the software throughout the development process based on feedback from stakeholders. | Waterfall is more rigid and changes to the software can be difficult to implement after the development phase has been completed. |
requirements | In Waterfall, all the requirements are defined upfront | requirements are developed and refined throughout the development process based on feedback from stakeholders. |
Testing approach | testing is typically performed by a dedicated testing team | testing is often performed by the development team itself, with testers working closely with developers to ensure that defects are found and fixed quickly. |
Team collaboration | Agile emphasizes teamwork between developers, testers, and business analysts to guarantee that the product satisfies the requirements of all stakeholders. | Waterfall often results in less collaboration between teams and more division between them. |
In software testing, a QA (Quality Assurance) Engineer's responsibility is to guarantee that the software product complies with the organization's quality standards and criteria. They are responsible for planning the testing process by creating test plans and defining test strategies.
They also work with the development team to identify test cases and scenarios. Additionally, they execute test cases and scenarios to identify defects and ensure the software meets the specified requirements. They analyze test results to identify areas for improvement and log any issues found during testing.
To improve testing efficiency and shorten testing times, QA engineers also create and manage automated tests. They collaborate closely with the development team to address any problems that arise during testing and guarantee that the software satisfies the organization's quality standards. In order to maintain traceability and provide a record of the testing process, they also document the testing process, including test plans, test cases, and test results.
Test plans and test cases are both important components of software testing. A test plan outlines the overall testing strategy for a project, while a test case is a specific set of steps and conditions that are designed to test a particular aspect of the software. Here's the key differences between the two:
Test plan | Test case |
---|---|
Outlines the overall testing strategy for a project | Specifies the steps and conditions for testing a particular aspect of the software |
Usually created before testing begins | Created during the testing phase |
Covers multiple test scenarios and types | Covers a specific test scenario or type |
Describes the testing objectives, scope, approach, and resources required | Describes the preconditions, actions, and expected results of a particular test |
Provides a high-level view of the testing process | Provides a detailed view of a single test |
May be updated throughout the project as testing progresses | May be reused or modified for similar tests in the future |
System testing and acceptance testing are two important types of testing that are performed during the software development life cycle. While both types of testing are important for ensuring the quality and functionality of software systems, there are some key differences between them. These are some key differences between system testing and acceptance testing:
Aspects | System testing | Acceptance testing |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Verify system requirements and design | Verify that the system meets business requirements and is ready for use by end-users |
Scope | Testing the system as a whole | Testing specific scenarios and use cases that end-users will perform |
Timing | Performed before acceptance testing | Performed after system testing is complete |
Testers | Performed by development or QA team | Performed by end-users or customer representatives |
Outcome | determines system flaws and problems | confirms that the system satisfies the requirements and is fit for its intended use. |
Criteria | Focuses on system functionality, performance, security, and usability | Focuses on meeting business requirements and user needs |
Usability testing evaluates how user-friendly and easy-to-use a software system is for its intended users, considering their perspectives and needs. It involves observing and measuring how actual end-users interact with the system to identify any usability issues and areas for improvement. Usability testing can be performed at different stages of the software development process, such as during prototyping, design, development, and post-release maintenance.
Here is a general process for performing usability testing:
Ad-hoc testing is a testing approach where testing is performed informally and without a specific plan or methodology. It is usually done on an as-needed basis and is often driven by intuition or past experience. There may be little or no documentation of the testing process, and it is typically done manually, although some ad-hoc testing may be automated using tools like record-and-playback testing or exploratory testing while structured testing is a testing approach where testing is performed according to a specific methodology or testing framework, such as Waterfall or Agile. Testing is planned and executed systematically, with a specific goal in mind. Test cases are designed and executed in a structured way, and documentation is a key part of the process. Test cases are documented and tracked, making it easier to reproduce the testing and to ensure that all necessary tests have been performed. Structured testing may involve automation, particularly for repetitive tasks or tests that require a large amount of data or computation.
When developing and deploying software, two distinct environments are used: the test environment and the production environment. The primary differences between the two are as follows:
Parameters | Test environment | Production environment |
---|---|---|
Define | The test environment is where software is tested before being deployed to production | End users use the software in the production environment. |
purpose | The objective of the test environment is to find and solve faults, bugs, or issues in software before it is distributed to end users. | The goal of the production environment is to make the software accessible to end users for regular use. |
data | In the test environment, test data is used to simulate real-world scenarios. | In the production environment, real data is used by end-users. |
configuration | The test environment is usually configured to mimic the production environment but may have differences such as lower data volumes, different hardware or software configurations, or simulated users. | The production environment is configured for optimal performance, stability, and security. |
Access | The test environment is usually restricted to a limited number of users, typically developers and testers. | The production environment is accessible to a larger group of users, including customers and stakeholders. |
changes | Changes can be made more freely in the test environment, including software updates, configuration changes, and testing of new features. | Changes to the production environment are typically more limited and must go through a strict change management process to avoid impacting end-users. |
Support | Support for the test environment is typically provided by the development team | support for the production environment is usually provided by a dedicated operations team. |
A test plan, which specifies the general strategy, objectives, scope, and approach for testing a software application, is a key document in the software testing process. Its goal is to give a complete testing guide and ensure that all components of the software are adequately tested. It basically acts as a road map for the testing procedure, outlining the testing goals, dates, and objectives. It gives testers the ability to pinpoint the features that need to be evaluated, the testing's scope, and the testing techniques to use, such as functional, performance, and security testing.
The test plan also aids in the effective allocation of testing resources, ensuring that all testing tasks are completed in accordance with the planned timeline. Additionally, it helps in identifying potential risks and problems that can occur throughout the testing process and offers a strategy to reduce these risks.
category | Code coverage | Test coverage |
---|---|---|
Definition | Code coverage is a metric used to measure the amount of code that is executed during testing. | Test coverage is a metric used to measure the extent to which the software has been tested. |
Focus | Code coverage focuses on the codebase and aims to ensure that all code paths have been executed. | Test coverage focuses on the test cases and aims to ensure that all requirements have been tested. |
Type of metric | Code coverage is a quantitative metric, measured as a percentage of code lines executed during testing. | Test coverage is both a quantitative and qualitative metric, measured as a percentage of requirements tested and the quality of the tests executed. |
Goals | The goal of code coverage is to identify areas of the code that have not been tested and improve the reliability of the software. | The goal of test coverage is to ensure that all requirements have been tested and the software meets the desired quality standards. |
Coverage tools | Code coverage can be measured using tools like JaCoCo, Cobertura, and Emma. | Test coverage can be measured using tools like HP Quality Center, IBM Rational, and Microsoft Test Manager. |
Integration testing and system testing are two important types of testing performed during the software development life cycle. Here's a the differences between them :
Aspects | Integration testing | System testing |
---|---|---|
Define | Integration testing is a type of testing in which individual software modules are combined and tested as a group. | System testing is a type of testing in which the complete software system is tested as a whole, including all of its components, interfaces, and external dependencies. |
Goal | The goal is to identify any defects or issues that arise when the modules interact with one another. | The goal is to verify that the system meets its requirements and is functioning as expected. |
Scope | Integration testing focuses on testing the interaction between different software modules or components. | System testing focuses on testing the entire software system, including all of its components and interfaces. |
Timing | Integration testing is typically performed after unit testing and before system testing. | System testing is typically performed after integration testing and before acceptance testing. |
Objective | The objective of integration testing is to detect any issues related to module integration, such as communication errors, incorrect data passing, and synchronization problems. | The objective of system testing is to verify that the software system as a whole meets its functional and non-functional requirements, including performance, security, usability, and reliability. |
Approach | Integration testing can be performed using different approaches, such as top-down, bottom-up, or a combination of both. | System testing can be performed using different approaches, such as black-box, white-box, or gray-box testing, depending on the level of knowledge of the internal workings of the system. |
Test Environment | Integration testing is usually performed in a test environment that simulates the production environment but with limited scope and resources. | System testing is usually performed in an environment that closely resembles the production environment, including all the hardware, software, and network configurations. |
Tester | Integration testing can be performed by developers or dedicated testers who have knowledge of the system architecture and design. | System testing is usually performed by dedicated testers who have little or no knowledge of the system internals, to simulate real user scenarios. |
The main role of bug tracking is to provide a centralized platform for reporting, tracking, and resolving defects to ensure an efficient and effective testing process.
Bug tracking tools allow testers to report and track defects in a structured and organized manner, assign defects to team members, set priorities and severity levels, and track the status of each defect from initial report to resolution. They also provide reports and metrics to identify trends, track progress, and make data-driven decisions about the testing process. Bug tracking tools help testing teams improve their efficiency, collaboration, and communication, leading to a more thorough testing process. By ensuring that defects are properly addressed and resolved before software release, they also reduce the risk of negative impact on software functionality and user experience.
Thes are the major differences between sanity testing and regression testing :
Criteria | Sanity Testing | Regression Testing |
---|---|---|
Purpose | To quickly check if the critical functionality of the system is working as expected after a small change or fix has been made. | To ensure that the previously working functionality of the system is not affected after a change or fix has been made. |
scope | Narrow scope, covering only critical functionality or areas affected by recent changes. | Broad scope, covering all the features and functionalities of the software. |
Time of testing | Performed after each small change or fix to ensure the core features are still working as expected. | Performed after major changes or before the release of a new version of the software to ensure there are no new defects or issues. |
Test coverage | Basic tests to ensure the system is still functioning. | Comprehensive tests to verify that the existing functionality of the software is not affected by new changes. |
Test environment | Limited test environment with minimum hardware and software requirements. | Comprehensive test environment that covers various platforms, operating systems, and devices. |
Static testing is a type of testing in which the code or documentation is reviewed without executing the software. The goal is to find defects in the early stages of development and prevent them from becoming more serious problems later on.
Dynamic testing is a type of testing in which the software is executed with a set of test cases and the behavior and performance of the system is observed and analyzed. The goal is to verify that the software meets its requirements and performs as expected.
Criteria | Static testing | Dynamic testing |
---|---|---|
Timing | Performed before the software is executed. | Performed during the software execution. |
Goal | To find defects early in the development cycle. | To ensure that the software meets functional and performance requirements. |
Type of Analysis | Non-execution based analysis of the software artifacts such as requirements, design documents, and code. | Execution-based analysis of the software behavior such as input/output testing, user interface testing, and performance testing. |
Approach | Review, walkthrough, and inspection. | Validation and verification. |
Technique | Static Code Analysis, Formal Verification, and Peer Review. | Unit testing, Integration testing, System testing, and Acceptance testing. |
Test documentation plays a crucial role in software testing as it provides a comprehensive record of the testing process and results. The importance of test documentation can be summarized as follows:
The role of a QA (Quality Assurance) Engineer in software testing is to ensure that the software product meets the quality standards and requirements set by the organization. They are responsible for planning the testing process by creating test plans and defining test strategies. They also work with the development team to identify test cases and scenarios. Additionally, they execute test cases and scenarios to identify defects and ensure the software meets the specified requirements. They analyze test results to identify areas for improvement and log any issues found during testing.
To improve testing efficiency and shorten testing times, QA engineers also create and manage automated tests. They collaborate closely with the development team to address any problems that arise during testing and guarantee that the software satisfies the organization's quality standards. In order to maintain traceability and provide a record of the testing process, they also document the testing process, including test plans, test cases, and test results.
Test plans and test cases are both important components of software testing. A test plan outlines the overall testing strategy for a project, while a test case is a specific set of steps and conditions that are designed to test a particular aspect of the software. Here's the key differences between the two:
Test plan | Test case |
---|---|
Outlines the overall testing strategy for a project | Specifies the steps and conditions for testing a particular aspect of the software |
Usually created before testing begins | Created during the testing phase |
Covers multiple test scenarios and types | Covers a specific test scenario or type |
Describes the testing objectives, scope, approach, and resources required | Describes the preconditions, actions, and expected results of a particular test |
Provides a high-level view of the testing process | Provides a detailed view of a single test |
May be updated throughout the project as testing progresses | May be reused or modified for similar tests in the future |
Here is the main differences between test scripts and test scenarios:
Aspects | Test Scripts | Test Scenario |
---|---|---|
Define | To automate the execution of a test case, a collection of instructions expressed in a programming language or scripting language. | A high-level description of the end-to-end test process, outlining the steps and conditions required to achieve a particular goal. |
Purpose | To automate repetitive testing tasks and provide consistent results | To ensure comprehensive testing coverage and verify the system behavior under specific conditions |
Level | Detailed and low-level | High level |
content | Specific and detailed steps for each test case | A series of related test cases that follow a logical flow |
Input | Technical and specific to the system being tested. | Business requirements or use cases |
Output | Test results and error logs | Detailed report of the testing process and results |
User | Typically used by testers or automation engineers | Used by testers, developers, business analysts, and other stakeholders |
Maintenance | Requires frequent updates to keep up with changes in the system being tested | Needs updates less frequently, as it focuses on the overall testing process rather than specific test cases |
Manual Testing Interview Questions
Note : We have compiled all Manual Testing Interview Questions List for you in a template format. Feel free to comment on it. Check it out now!!
Test data is a crucial aspect of software testing as it helps to verify that the application functions correctly, performs efficiently, and is secure. It serves several critical purposes in software testing, including confirming the system's functionality by supplying inputs to detect errors or flaws, identifying rare but significant edge cases that could impact the application, ensuring the accuracy of the data stored in the system, enhancing test coverage by providing a diverse range of inputs and scenarios and bolstering security by emulating various attacks and scenarios to detect potential vulnerabilities. By utilizing test data, software testers can enhance the application's quality and minimize the time and cost associated with resolving issues.
Performance testing and stress testing are two types of software testing that help evaluate a system's performance and behavior under different conditions. The main difference between these two testing types is their purpose and the testing parameters. Here's a main the difference between them :
Parameters | Performance testing | Stress testing |
---|---|---|
purpose | To determine how well the system performs under normal and expected loads | To determine the system' stability and resilience under extreme and beyond expected loads |
Goal | To ensure the system meets the expected performance criteria and user experience | To determine the system' breaking point and identify the weaknesses and bottlenecks |
Load level | Moderate to high load, typically up to the system' capacity | High to extremely high load, beyond the system' capacity |
Testing environment | Controlled environment that simulates expected user behavior | Uncontrolled environment that mimics real-world usage |
Focus | Response time, throughput, and resource utilization | tability, availability, and recovery time |
Test duration | Typically a longer duration to measure system behavior under sustained load | Typically a shorter duration to measure the system' response under peak loads |
Testing tools | Load generators and monitoring tools | Load generators, chaos engineering tools, and fault injection tools |
Testing type | Load testing, volume testing, and endurance testing | Spike testing, soak testing, and destructive testing |
Test coverage is a measure of how extensively software has been tested, typically expressed as a percentage of the code or functionality exercised by the test cases. It's critical to ensure comprehensive test coverage to detect potential defects and guarantee that the software satisfies the specified requirements. To achieve complete test coverage, it's important to have clear and comprehensive requirements that encompass all possible use cases and edge cases, develop a detailed test plan, utilize a variety of testing techniques, automate testing where feasible, utilize code coverage tools to identify any untested code or functionality, and continually monitor and enhance the testing process as the software evolves and new requirements are added.
Defects are problems that need to be fixed to restore the expected behavior of the system, while enhancements are improvements that add value to the existing system. Here is the difference between them :
Defects | Enhancement |
---|---|
A defect is a deviation from the expected behavior of the system or software. | An enhancement is a new or improved feature that adds value to the existing system or software. |
Defects are errors that cause the system or software to behave unexpectedly, leading to incorrect or inconsistent results. | Enhancements are changes made to improve the functionality, usability, or performance of the system or software. |
Defects are usually reported as bugs or errors that need to be fixed. | Enhancements are usually suggested as ideas for improving the system or software. |
Defects are typically found during testing or after the system or software has been deployed. | Enhancements are usually requested by users or stakeholders before or after the system or software has been deployed. |
Defects are usually given high priority as they can affect the system' stability and performance. | Enhancements may or may not be given high priority depending on their impact and the project' goals. |
Defects are usually fixed in the next release or patch of the software. | Enhancements are usually implemented in a future release or version of the software. |
A critical function in software development teams is performed by the QA analyst who ensures that the software meets the necessary quality standards and specifications. The QA analyst's main duties involve scrutinizing project requirements and specifications, devising and implementing test plans, detecting and reporting defects, collaborating with the development team, participating in product design and code reviews, and maintaining documentation related to testing processes.
Regression testing is carried out to confirm that alterations made to an existing software system or application do not result in unintentional impacts. The primary goal of regression testing is to verify that changes to the software do not introduce any new errors or cause previously resolved issues to recur in the existing software functionality.
Regression testing is essential because it ensures that the quality and reliability of the software are maintained following any changes made to it. It helps to detect any bugs or problems that may have arisen during the development process or while adding new features. If regression testing is not performed, there is a risk that defects may go unnoticed, resulting in decreased software quality and negative impacts on the user experience.
Smoke testing and regression testing are both software testing techniques used to ensure the quality of a software product, but they serve different purposes and are performed at different times during the development process.
Smoke testing is a preliminary testing procedure used to confirm that the software application's primary and fundamental features are operating as expected after a fresh build or deployment. It is usually done before performing additional testing to identify any significant flaws that would prevent the testing from continuing. Smoke testing is typically a brief, simple test that focuses on finding significant flaws, including installation or setup difficulties, which can be fixed before further testing.
Regression testing is a more comprehensive testing process that is conducted to verify that the existing functionality of the software is working as expected after new changes are made to the software. It is performed to ensure that changes made to the software, such as adding new features or fixing bugs, have not introduced new issues or caused existing functionalities to break. Regression testing is usually performed after smoke testing and is designed to be more thorough and rigorous.
Risk-based testing and exploratory testing are two different approaches to software testing, which are used to address different aspects of software quality.
A testing strategy known as "risk-based testing" focuses on locating and resolving the most significant hazards connected to a software application. In this method, testing efforts are prioritized based on an assessment of the software's possible hazards. Risk-based testing seeks to reduce the likelihood of failures by ensuring that the software's most crucial and high-risk sections are fully tested. In safety-critical applications including aviation, medical equipment, and nuclear power plants, risk-based testing is frequently used while exploratory testing is a testing approach that emphasizes the tester's creativity, experience, and knowledge of the software application. In this approach, the tester explores the software application and tests it in an unstructured manner, without following a predefined test plan. The aim of exploratory testing is to find defects that may not be easily discovered through scripted testing, such as unexpected behavior or usability issues. Exploratory testing is often used in agile software development environments, where the requirements and specifications are continuously evolving, and there is a need for quick feedback.
At various stages of the software development lifecycle, two individual tasks known as test planning and test estimations are frequently performed. Test estimating involves determining the amount of work required to complete testing activities, whereas test planning requires developing a detailed plan for how testing will be carried out.
Test estimation: Test estimation typically takes place early in the project, during the requirement gathering and analysis phase. The goal of test estimation is to estimate the amount of time, resources, and personnel required to complete testing activities, such as test case development, test execution, and defect reporting. Test estimation is important because it helps project managers allocate resources appropriately and make informed decisions about project timelines and budgets.
Test planning: The process of test planning includes creating a thorough plan for how testing will be carried out. Information about the test strategy, the different kinds of tests that will be run, the testing tools and technologies that will be utilized, the test environment, and the roles and duties of the testing team are all included in this plan. Test planning is normally completed after the requirements have been finalized and before the testing phase begins.
These are the major differences between test case and defect :-
Test case | Defects |
---|---|
A particular set of circumstances or inputs that are used to test the efficiency, effectiveness, and conduct of an application or system. | A mistake, problem, or issue that is found during testing and shows that the software application or system does not work as planned or does not adhere to its specifications. |
ensures that the system or piece of software satisfies its requirements and performs as expected. | indicates that there is an issue that has to be fixed with the software application or system. |
created by a tester to confirm that a particular software feature or system performs as intended. | when a tester or end user runs into a bug or difficulty while utilizing the system or piece of software. |
used to guarantee the robustness, dependability, and compliance with the quality requirements of the software application or system. | used to locate and monitor flaws or issues in the software system or application, after which developers fix them. |
Performance testing and load testing are both important types of testing that help evaluate the performance of a software application or system, but there are some key differences between the them :
Performance testing | Load testing |
---|---|
A type of testing that evaluates the performance of a software application or system under specific conditions such as a specific number of concurrent users or requests. | A type of testing that evaluates the behavior of a software application or system under varying and increasing loads such as increasing number of concurrent users or requests. |
Focuses on measuring response times, throughput, and resource utilization of the software application or system under specific conditions. | Focuses on evaluating how the software application or system behaves under heavy loads and whether it can handle the anticipated user load without performance degradation. |
Typically used to identify and eliminate performance bottlenecks and improve the overall performance of the software application or system. | Typically used to determine the maximum load that the software application or system can handle, identify the point at which it fails, and optimize its performance under high loads. |
Can be conducted using different tools and techniques such as load testing, stress testing, endurance testing, and spike testing. | Can be conducted using tools and techniques such as load testing, stress testing, and capacity testing. |
Examples of performance testing include testing the response time of a web page or the scalability of a database. | Examples of load testing include testing how a web application behaves under high traffic and user loads, or how a database responds to a large number of concurrent requests. |
Aspects | Compatibility testing | Interoperability testing |
---|---|---|
Define | Compatibility testing is a type of software testing that evaluates the compatibility of an application or system across different platforms, operating systems, browsers, devices, or software versions. | Interoperability testing focuses on validating the interaction and communication between different systems, components, or software applications. |
objective | Verify software functions consistently in various environments | Assess the ability of systems to work together and exchange information |
Scope | Platforms, operating systems, browsers, devices, software versions | Systems, components, software applications, data exchange |
Key Factors | Hardware configurations, operating systems, browsers, displays | Data exchange formats, protocols, interfaces, APIs |
Purpose | Reach a wider audience, consistent | Seamless communication, integration, and data exchange |
Test data and test cases are both important terms used in software testing. The main difference between them is that test data refers to the input data that is used for testing a particular functionality, while a test case is a set of instructions or conditions used to test that functionality.
These are some differences between them:
Test Case | Test data |
---|---|
A test case is a documented set of conditions or actions that need to be executed to validate a particular aspect of the system. | Test data refers to the specific set of inputs or data values that are used as input for executing a test case. |
It specifies the steps, preconditions, expected outcomes, and any specific data inputs required to execute the test. | Test data is designed to cover various scenarios and conditions to validate the behavior of the system under test. |
A test case typically consists of a unique identifier, a description of the test scenario, steps to be followed, and the expected results. | It can include both valid and invalid data, boundary values, edge cases, and any other inputs necessary to thoroughly test the system. |
It provides a detailed roadmap for conducting a specific test and serves as a reference for testers to ensure consistent and reproducible testing. | For example, if testing a login functionality, test data may include valid usernames and passwords, incorrect passwords, empty fields, or inputs that exceed the maximum character limit. |
Test cases often reference the necessary test data to be used during their execution. | Test data is essentially the data used as input during the execution of a test case. |
Test data is an integral part of test cases as it provides the specific values to be tested against the expected results. | It is crucial for achieving meaningful and comprehensive test coverage. |
In software testing, a test suite and a test script are both important terms used to describe different aspects of the testing process. A test suite is a group of multiple test cases that are organized together, whereas a test script is a set of instructions or code used to automate the testing process for a specific test case. These are some differences between them :
Test Suite | Test Script |
---|---|
A collection of multiple test cases | A set of instructions or code used to automate testing |
It can contain test cases for multiple functionalities or scenarios | It is specific to a single test case |
It is used to organize and manage multiple test cases | It is used to automate a specific test case |
It can be executed manually or with the help of automation tools | It is used for automated testing |
Regression test suite, acceptance test suite, and performance test suite are the example of test suite | Selenium WebDriver scripts, API test scripts, and performance test scripts are the examples of test scripts |
Test coverage and traceability are both important concepts in software testing, but they are different in their focus and objectives. Here's the differences between them:
Test coverage | Traceability |
---|---|
Measures the extent to which a set of test cases covers a specific aspect or feature of the software | Tracks the relationships between requirements, test cases, and other project artifacts |
aims to reduce the possibility of undiscovered faults by focusing on ensuring that all aspects of the software are tested. | ensures that requirements are effectively implemented, tested, and managed as changes to requirements occur. |
Statements, branches, conditions, and other code elements can all be included in test coverage metrics. | Coverage of requirements, test cases, design papers, and other project artifacts are some examples of traceability measures. |
Test coverage identifies software components that have not received enough testing. | Traceability makes ensuring that every requirement has been tested and every modification has been adequately documented. |
Testing efforts can be prioritized using test coverage, and improvement opportunities can be found. | Traceability can be used to evaluate changes' effects, spot testing gaps, and enhance requirements management. |
Code coverage, branch coverage, and functional coverage are some examples. | Examples include requirement tracing, test case tracing, and design tracing. |
Testing distributed systems may be a difficult undertaking due to their nature of having several components dispersed across different machines talking with each other to execute a set of tasks. The following are some major difficulties in testing distributed systems:
An organized and comprehensive approach is necessary to develop a successful test strategy for a complicated system. You can follow the stages below as a roadmap for the procedure: Learn everything you can about the architecture, design, interfaces, and operation of the system first. Next, establish specific testing goals and list potential risks, prioritizing them according to their significance and likelihood. Determine the necessary test coverage and create detailed test scenarios and cases that check the system's behavior in a number of real-world circumstances based on this knowledge. Establish the necessary test environment, run tests in accordance with your strategy, and provide results to stakeholders, including any problems detected. Finally, based on the data acquired, iterate on your test strategy, refining your approach to fulfill testing objectives and achieve desired test coverage levels.
Creating a complete test suite for a complicated system may be difficult, but it is critical to ensure that the system works as excepted and meets its criteria. Starting with a thorough understanding of the system's architecture, design, requirements, and dependencies is essential if you want to create a test suite that works. After that, you must specify the main test goals and list all of the possible use cases and scenarios that the system might experience, including both typical and extreme situations. Following that, you may develop comprehensive test cases for each scenario and rank them according to how critical and dependent they are.
Planning for test automation is essential if you want to shorten the time and effort needed for testing. Once the test suite is prepared, you may run the tests, examine the results, and spot any flaws or problems that require fixing. Repeat the testing process iteratively, incorporating feedback from the previous testing cycles, to continuously improve the test suite and ensure the system is thoroughly tested. It's also vital to involve different stakeholders in the testing process and communicate the testing progress and results effectively.
To effectively manage test data for a large system, follow these steps:
There are various phases to performing security testing on a web application. To begin, identify potential security threats like injection attacks, cross-site scripting (XSS), cross-site request forgery (CSRF), and authentication and authorization concerns. Next, the attack surface of the web application should be mapped to locate all potential entry points. Vulnerability scanning using automated tools such as web application vulnerability scanners is another essential step to identify vulnerabilities. Additionally, manual testing is required to identify vulnerabilities that automated tools could miss. Penetration testing is used to stimulate real-world attacks and detect potential weaknesses. A manual study of the web application's source code can also reveal vulnerabilities that were previously missed. It is critical to validate the results to confirm that they can be abused and to report any vulnerabilities to the development team. Finally, after resolving the vulnerabilities, it is critical to retest the web application to identify any new vulnerabilities introduced.
When performing compatibility testing for a mobile application, the primary goal is to ensure that the application functions properly across a broad range of mobile devices, operating systems, and network configurations. there are several measures that should be taken during testing ,these measures can include the following:
There are several types of test cases that are used in software testing to ensure that the software meets the specified requirements and functions correctly. Here are some common types of test cases and how they are created:
Testing professionals frequently create test cases using a systematic method that includes specifying the input, anticipated result, and test procedures to be used. They make sure that all probable scenarios are covered in the test cases, and they take into account the different scenarios and possible combinations. The necessary stakeholders assess and give their approval to the test cases before they are executed.
Test plan | Test suite |
---|---|
A test plan is a document that outlines the testing strategy for a software project. | A test suite is a collection of test cases that are designed to test a specific aspect of the software |
It provides a comprehensive view of the testing effort, including testing objectives, scope, strategy, environment, tasks, deliverables, and exit criteria | It is a more granular and detailed level of testing that focuses on testing individual features or components of the software. |
It is created before the start of the testing process, usually by a test manager or lead in consultation with stakeholders. | It is created during the testing process, usually by a tester or test automation engineer.It |
It is a static document that guides the entire testing effort and ensures testing aligns with project goals. | It is a dynamic entity that can be modified, updated, or expanded based on testing needs, test results, or changes to the software |
A test plan is more focused on the testing process as a whole, and less on individual test cases. | The test suite is more focused on individual test cases, and less on the testing process as a whole. |
The primary responsibility of a testing architect in a software development team is to create an effective testing strategy for the software product. It involves designing and implementing a comprehensive testing strategy to ensure software quality. They collaborate closely with the development team to create test plans, define test cases, and develop automated testing scripts for functional and non-functional testing. Additionally, the testing architect manages the testing process, tracks bugs and issues, prioritizes test cases, and reports on testing status. Ultimately, the testing architect ensures timely delivery of software that meets requirements and stays within budget, emphasizing their criticality to the project's success.
Ensuring data integrity during testing is critical for producing dependable and effective software. To accomplish this, verify that the test data is valid, comprehensive, and correct. The testing environment should be properly configured, and access restrictions should be put in place to prevent unauthorized data access, alteration, or deletion. Furthermore, testing scenarios should include a variety of data inputs, including faulty and unexpected data, and test automation can be utilized to increase test coverage and accuracy while reducing time. These techniques will assist you in identifying potential data integrity risks and designing tests to solve them. By adhering to these best practices, you may assist ensure that the software product works as planned and is trustworthy for end users.
An incident report and a defect report are both types of reports used in software testing, but they serve different purposes. Here are the differences between the two:
Incident Report: - A document known as an Incident Report is used to describe an unexpected event that happened during software testing or during real-world application. It documents any deviation from expected behavior, including errors, crashes, and system failures. Incident reports may or may not have a clear cause, and they can arise from a variety of sources, including software defects, hardware failures, or user errors.
Defect Report: - A defect report is a piece of documentation that reports a bug or vulnerability in the software. It identifies a specific deviation from the product's requirements or design specifications. The report is typically generated during testing but may also be reported by end-users after the product has been released. The purpose of a defect report is to document the specific issue so that it can be reproduced, diagnosed, and fixed.
Testing non-functional requirements like performance, security, and usability is an important aspect of software testing. Here are some areas that you need to handle in testing :
A test environment and a production environment are two distinct environments used in the software development life cycle.
Test environment | Production environment |
---|---|
A test environment is a controlled environment used for testing software changes, upgrades, or new applications. | a production environment is the live environment where the software application is deployed and used by end-users. |
It is a replica of the production environment but is used solely for testing purposes. | The production environment is the environment where the software runs in the real world, and any issues can impact end-users. |
It allows developers and testers to verify that the application functions as expected without affecting the live production environment. | Therefore, it is highly important to ensure that any changes deployed to the production environment are thoroughly tested in a test environment before release. |
Different forms of testing, including functional, performance, and security tests, are carried out in test environments. | Production environments need to be highly stable, secure, and scalable to handle the load of live user traffic. |
Test environments can be developed in a variety of configurations based on the unique testing requirements, and they can be hosted locally, on-premises, or in the cloud. | The performance and security of the production environment are crucial for guaranteeing the application' smooth operation, and any issues in this environment can have significant effects on the business. |
To create an effective testing strategy for mobile applications, here is the given steps you must need to follow:
Be sure to check out our comprehensive guide on Top Asked mobile testing interview questions to further strengthen your preparation.
There are various testing methodologies, each with its own unique approach to testing software applications. Here are some of the most common testing methodologies and when to use them:
Manual Testing Interview Questions
Note : We have compiled all Manual Testing Interview Questions List for you in a template format. Feel free to comment on it. Check it out now!!
Exploratory Testing | Scenario-based Testing |
---|---|
A testing technique that involves simultaneous test design and execution. | A testing technique that involves creating test scenarios in advance and executing them. |
There might not be a clear test plan or script for testers to follow. | A predetermined test plan or script is followed by testers. |
Testers are encouraged to use their knowledge, skills, and experience to identify defects that may not be covered in a test script. | Testers execute tests according to predetermined scripts or scenarios. |
Typically used for ad-hoc or unscripted testing where the requirements are unclear or unknown. | Typically used for testing where the requirements are well-defined and documented. |
Helps to identify unexpected defects and usability issues. | Helps to ensure that all scenarios are covered and defects are identified. |
Less documentation is required. | Requires more documentation for test scenarios and test results. |
Can be more time-consuming due to the need for test design and execution. | Can be less time-consuming as scenarios are already predefined. |
Appropriate for testing complex systems with a large number of variables and dependencies. | Suitable for testing systems with well-defined requirements and limited variability. |
To perform load testing on a web application, follow these steps:
Performance testing is a type of testing that is used to determine how well a system or application operates under specified conditions such as excessive load, high traffic, or other stress factors.
Performance testing comes in a variety of forms, such as load testing, stress testing, endurance testing, spike testing, and scalability testing. Stress testing is used to assess a system's capability to manage extreme load situations above its normal capacity. Load testing evaluates how well a system operates under normal and peak load levels. Endurance testing is used to determine the system's ability to handle sustained loads over a long period of time, while spike testing is used to determine the system's ability to handle sudden spikes in load. Scalability testing is used to determine how well a system can scale up or down to handle changing levels of load. The choice of performance testing type depends on the specific performance goals and requirements of the system or application being tested.
Test automation plays a vital role in software testing as it automates test case execution, resulting in increased efficiency and time savings. It ensures consistent and repeatable testing, improves test coverage, and is particularly valuable for regression testing. Automated tests provide accurate and reliable results, detect defects early in the development lifecycle, and allow for scalability in testing. Test automation also simplifies the maintenance of regression test suites and enables parallel execution for faster testing cycles
Performing integration testing in a distributed system involves testing the interaction and integration between different components or services within the system. Here are some steps to perform integration testing in a distributed system:
Integration testing in distributed systems can be complex, requiring careful planning, thorough testing, and close monitoring.
Regression testing is a type of software testing that is used to ensure that changes or modifications made to the code of a software application do not have any unintended effects on previously working functionality. There are different types of regression testing that can be used depending on the needs of the project. These include:
Effective communication between the testing team and other teams in a project is important to get a successful result. To ensure efficient communication, consider the following advice:
Creating a test plan for a complex system in manual testing involves similar principles as outlined in the previous response. Here's a step-by-step guide:
Testing cloud-based applications presents several challenges that include:
In software testing, both test conditions and test scenarios are used to define and design test cases. While they are related, they represent different aspects of the testing process. Here's the difference between the them:
Test condition | Test scenario |
---|---|
A specific element or attribute of a system that needs to be verified | A sequence of steps that describe a specific use case or interaction with the system |
Derived from the requirements or specifications of the system | Derived from the user stories or use cases of the system |
Describes a narrow aspect of the system that needs to be tested | Describes a broader concept that encompasses multiple test conditions |
Examples: verifying that a login page accepts valid credentials, verifying that a search bar returns relevant results | Examples: testing the login process, testing the search functionality |
Used to define and execute test cases | Used to plan and organize testing activities |
Helps ensure that the system meets the specified requirements | Helps ensure that the system is working as intended in real-world scenarios |
Performing security testing on a distributed system requires a comprehensive approach that takes into consideration the various components and interfaces of the system. Here are the given steps to perform security testing on a distributed system :
test environment | Test bed |
---|---|
A test environment refers to the infrastructure, hardware, software, and network setup where testing activities are conducted. | A test bed refers to a configured setup that includes hardware, software, and network components specifically designed for testing purposes. |
Provides necessary resources for executing test cases and evaluating system behavior. | Controlled environment simulating real-world scenarios for testing. |
Can include development, staging, or production environments. | Created for specific testing purposes (e.g., performance, compatibility, security). |
May consist of interconnected systems, databases, networks, and supporting tools. | Combination of physical hardware, virtual machines, operating systems, and test automation tools. |
Varied configurations, data sets, and access rights based on testing requirements. | Replicates production environment with necessary hardware and software configurations. |
Shared among different testing teams or projects, requiring coordination. | Dedicated setup created and maintained by a specific testing team or project. |
Changes or updates can impact multiple testing activities, requiring planning. | Changes managed within the scope of a testing project, limited impact. |
Focuses on infrastructure for testing, may not have all required components. | Provides a complete and controlled environment tailored to specific testing objective. |
Testing complex workflows can be a daunting task, but there are effective strategies to handle it:
Exploratory testing is a method of testing where the tester learns about the system while testing it. In this testing testers use their understanding of the system to create and perform test cases, adjusting their testing approach as they learn more about the system. The main aim of exploratory testing is to identify problems in the system that may be overlooked by other scripted testing methods. This method is especially useful in complex and fast-paced systems where the requirements are unclear or when time and resources are limited. The purpose of exploratory testing is to complement other testing methods and to provide a flexible and adaptable approach that can quickly and effectively identify issues and problems in the system.
To determine if testing is effective, there are different ways to measure it, including:
The testing coordinator in a software development team is responsible for managing the testing activities throughout the software development life cycle. They generally work with the project manager, developers, and other stakeholders to develop a comprehensive test plan, design and execute tests, manage defects, prepare test reports, and identify opportunities for process improvement. This role is crucial to ensuring that the software is thoroughly tested and meets the quality standards of the organization.
To perform load testing on a distributed system, you need to consider the following steps:
Testing legacy systems can pose a challenge as they were created with older technologies and may lack proper documentation. To handle testing of legacy systems, a risk analysis should be conducted to prioritize the areas of the system that require testing. Existing documentation should be reviewed, and reverse engineering can be done to understand the system better. Test cases should be created, focusing on critical functionalities, and automation can be used where possible. Regression testing should be performed to ensure changes do not break existing functionality. Collaboration with domain experts can identify areas that require extensive testing, and documenting and tracking defects found during testing is essential for prioritizing bug fixes.
Localization testing is an essential part of manual testing that focuses on assessing how well a software application is adapted to a specific locale or target market. Its importance lies in ensuring cultural adaptation, validating user experience, verifying language accuracy, validating functionality, complying with legal requirements, and enabling successful market expansion. By conducting localization testing, software applications can effectively cater to diverse markets, enhance user experience, and increase market acceptance.
User acceptance testing (UAT) on a complex system can be challenging. Here are some steps that can be taken to perform UAT effectively:
200 . Describe what Fuzz Testing is and how important it is.
Fuzz testing, also known as fuzzing, can be applied in manual testing alongside automated techniques. In manual fuzz testing, testers manually provide unexpected inputs to a software program to uncover vulnerabilities. It complements automated methods by allowing testers to apply their intuition and creativity to explore potential weaknesses. Manual fuzz testing is useful for exploratory testing, edge cases, input validation, user and system interaction. While it may not offer the same coverage as automated fuzzing, it benefits from human judgment. Proper training and expertise are crucial for effective manual fuzz testing, which helps identify vulnerabilities and improve software security and reliability.
Baseline Testing:
Baseline testing refers to the initial round of testing performed on a software system or application to establish a reference point or baseline. It involves executing a set of predefined tests on a stable version of the software to capture its performance, functionality, and behavior. Baseline testing serves as a starting point for future testing activities, allowing comparisons to be made between subsequent versions or releases of the software. It helps identify any deviations or changes from the established baseline, enabling effective tracking of software quality and progress over time.
Benchmark Testing:
Benchmark testing involves comparing the performance or capabilities of a software system or component against established benchmarks or standards. It measures and evaluates the system's performance metrics, such as speed, efficiency, throughput, response time, or resource utilization, in order to gauge its relative performance and identify areas for improvement. Benchmark testing helps determine how well the system performs under specific conditions and how it stacks up against industry standards or competitors. The results obtained from benchmark testing serve as a reference point for assessing and optimizing system performance, making informed decisions, and setting performance goals for future iterations or enhancements.
There are various types of testing tools available, and each serves a specific purpose in the software testing life cycle. Here are some common types of testing tools and when to use them:
Including manual testing in a test strategy is highly recommended for quality assurance teams, as it provides valuable insights from the end user's perspective. Manual testing, performed by human testers without automation frameworks, offers a powerful means of evaluating software based on a crucial metric: customer/user experience. While the agile software development process emphasizes automation, manual testing remains essential. A well-rounded candidate proficient in both manual and automation testing can greatly support QAs in efficiently conducting necessary tests. By adequately preparing for a manual testing interview, candidates can impress hiring managers and progress to the next stage of the hiring process.
To help job seekers at different stages of their careers, we've developed a comprehensive list of frequently asked manual testing interview questions. This resource provides an overview of manual testing concepts and presents over 50 relevant questions. Candidates are advised to have a solid understanding of these concepts and the ability to articulate their ideas clearly and convincingly. By diligently preparing using this resource, candidates can enhance their chances of success in future endeavors. Best of luck with your interview and your future career in manual testing!
Did you find this page helpful?
Try LambdaTest Now !!
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!