How to use describeTypeCheckingStrictness method of org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration class

Best Assertj code snippet using org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration.describeTypeCheckingStrictness

Source:RecursiveComparisonConfiguration.java

...475    describeIgnoredCollectionOrderInFields(description);476    describeIgnoredCollectionOrderInFieldsMatchingRegexes(description);477    describeRegisteredComparatorByTypes(description);478    describeRegisteredComparatorForFields(description);479    describeTypeCheckingStrictness(description);480    return description.toString();481  }482  boolean shouldIgnore(DualValue dualValue) {483    FieldLocation fieldLocation = dualValue.fieldLocation;484    return matchesAnIgnoredField(fieldLocation)485           || matchesAnIgnoredFieldRegex(fieldLocation)486           || shouldIgnoreFieldBasedOnFieldValue(dualValue);487  }488  Set<String> getNonIgnoredActualFieldNames(DualValue dualValue) {489    Set<String> actualFieldsNames = Objects.getFieldsNames(dualValue.actual.getClass());490    // we are doing the same as shouldIgnore(DualValue dualValue) but in two steps for performance reasons:491    // - we filter first ignored field by names that don't need building DualValues492    // - then we filter field DualValues with the remaining criteria that need to get the field value493    // DualValues are built introspecting fields which is expensive.494    return actualFieldsNames.stream()495                            // evaluate field name ignoring criteria on dualValue field location + field name496                            .filter(fieldName -> !shouldIgnoreFieldBasedOnFieldLocation(dualValue.fieldLocation.field(fieldName)))497                            .map(fieldName -> dualValueForField(dualValue, fieldName))498                            // evaluate field value ignoring criteria499                            .filter(fieldDualValue -> !shouldIgnoreFieldBasedOnFieldValue(fieldDualValue))500                            // back to field name501                            .map(DualValue::getFieldName)502                            .filter(fieldName -> !fieldName.isEmpty())503                            .collect(toSet());504  }505  // non accessible stuff506  private boolean shouldIgnoreFieldBasedOnFieldValue(DualValue dualValue) {507    return matchesAnIgnoredNullField(dualValue)508           || matchesAnIgnoredFieldType(dualValue)509           || matchesAnIgnoredEmptyOptionalField(dualValue);510  }511  private boolean shouldIgnoreFieldBasedOnFieldLocation(FieldLocation fieldLocation) {512    return matchesAnIgnoredField(fieldLocation) || matchesAnIgnoredFieldRegex(fieldLocation);513  }514  private static DualValue dualValueForField(DualValue parentDualValue, String fieldName) {515    Object actualFieldValue = COMPARISON.getSimpleValue(fieldName, parentDualValue.actual);516    // no guarantees we have a field in expected named as fieldName517    Object expectedFieldValue;518    try {519      expectedFieldValue = COMPARISON.getSimpleValue(fieldName, parentDualValue.expected);520    } catch (@SuppressWarnings("unused") Exception e) {521      // set the field to null to express it is absent, this not 100% accurate as the value could be null522      // but it works to evaluate if dualValue should be ignored with matchesAnIgnoredFieldType523      expectedFieldValue = null;524    }525    FieldLocation fieldLocation = parentDualValue.fieldLocation.field(fieldName);526    return new DualValue(fieldLocation, actualFieldValue, expectedFieldValue);527  }528  boolean hasCustomComparator(DualValue dualValue) {529    String fieldName = dualValue.getConcatenatedPath();530    if (hasComparatorForField(fieldName)) return true;531    if (dualValue.actual == null && dualValue.expected == null) return false;532    // best effort assuming actual and expected have the same type (not 100% true as we can compare object of differennt types)533    Class<?> valueType = dualValue.actual != null ? dualValue.actual.getClass() : dualValue.expected.getClass();534    return hasComparatorForType(valueType);535  }536  boolean shouldIgnoreOverriddenEqualsOf(DualValue dualValue) {537    // we must compare java basic types otherwise the recursive comparison loops infinitely!538    if (dualValue.isActualJavaType()) return false;539    // enums don't have fields, comparing them field by field has no sense, we need to use equals which is overridden and final540    if (dualValue.isActualAnEnum()) return false;541    return ignoreAllOverriddenEquals542           || matchesAnIgnoredOverriddenEqualsField(dualValue.fieldLocation)543           || (dualValue.actual != null && shouldIgnoreOverriddenEqualsOf(dualValue.actual.getClass()));544  }545  @VisibleForTesting546  boolean shouldIgnoreOverriddenEqualsOf(Class<? extends Object> clazz) {547    return matchesAnIgnoredOverriddenEqualsRegex(clazz) || matchesAnIgnoredOverriddenEqualsType(clazz);548  }549  boolean shouldIgnoreCollectionOrder(FieldLocation fieldLocation) {550    return ignoreCollectionOrder551           || matchesAnIgnoredCollectionOrderInField(fieldLocation)552           || matchesAnIgnoredCollectionOrderInFieldRegex(fieldLocation);553  }554  private void describeIgnoredFieldsRegexes(StringBuilder description) {555    if (!ignoredFieldsRegexes.isEmpty())556      description.append(format("- the fields matching the following regexes were ignored in the comparison: %s%n",557                                describeRegexes(ignoredFieldsRegexes)));558  }559  private void describeIgnoredFields(StringBuilder description) {560    if (!ignoredFields.isEmpty())561      description.append(format("- the following fields were ignored in the comparison: %s%n", describeIgnoredFields()));562  }563  private void describeIgnoredFieldsForTypes(StringBuilder description) {564    if (!ignoredTypes.isEmpty())565      description.append(format("- the following types were ignored in the comparison: %s%n", describeIgnoredTypes()));566  }567  private void describeIgnoreAllActualNullFields(StringBuilder description) {568    if (ignoreAllActualNullFields) description.append(format("- all actual null fields were ignored in the comparison%n"));569  }570  private void describeIgnoreAllActualEmptyOptionalFields(StringBuilder description) {571    if (getIgnoreAllActualEmptyOptionalFields())572      description.append(format("- all actual empty optional fields were ignored in the comparison (including Optional, OptionalInt, OptionalLong and OptionalDouble)%n"));573  }574  private void describeIgnoreAllExpectedNullFields(StringBuilder description) {575    if (ignoreAllExpectedNullFields) description.append(format("- all expected null fields were ignored in the comparison%n"));576  }577  private void describeOverriddenEqualsMethodsUsage(StringBuilder description, Representation representation) {578    String header = ignoreAllOverriddenEquals579        ? "- no overridden equals methods were used in the comparison (except for java types)"580        : "- overridden equals methods were used in the comparison";581    description.append(header);582    if (isConfiguredToIgnoreSomeButNotAllOverriddenEqualsMethods()) {583      description.append(format(" except for:%n"));584      describeIgnoredOverriddenEqualsMethods(description, representation);585    } else {586      description.append(format("%n"));587    }588  }589  private void describeIgnoredOverriddenEqualsMethods(StringBuilder description, Representation representation) {590    if (!ignoredOverriddenEqualsForFields.isEmpty())591      description.append(format("%s the following fields: %s%n", INDENT_LEVEL_2,592                                describeIgnoredOverriddenEqualsForFields()));593    if (!ignoredOverriddenEqualsForTypes.isEmpty())594      description.append(format("%s the following types: %s%n", INDENT_LEVEL_2,595                                describeIgnoredOverriddenEqualsForTypes(representation)));596    if (!ignoredOverriddenEqualsForFieldsMatchingRegexes.isEmpty())597      description.append(format("%s the types matching the following regexes: %s%n", INDENT_LEVEL_2,598                                describeRegexes(ignoredOverriddenEqualsForFieldsMatchingRegexes)));599  }600  private String describeIgnoredOverriddenEqualsForTypes(Representation representation) {601    List<String> fieldsDescription = ignoredOverriddenEqualsForTypes.stream()602                                                                    .map(representation::toStringOf)603                                                                    .collect(toList());604    return join(fieldsDescription).with(", ");605  }606  private String describeIgnoredOverriddenEqualsForFields() {607    return join(ignoredOverriddenEqualsForFields).with(", ");608  }609  private void describeIgnoreCollectionOrder(StringBuilder description) {610    if (ignoreCollectionOrder) description.append(format("- collection order was ignored in all fields in the comparison%n"));611  }612  private void describeIgnoredCollectionOrderInFields(StringBuilder description) {613    if (!ignoredCollectionOrderInFields.isEmpty())614      description.append(format("- collection order was ignored in the following fields in the comparison: %s%n",615                                describeIgnoredCollectionOrderInFields()));616  }617  private void describeIgnoredCollectionOrderInFieldsMatchingRegexes(StringBuilder description) {618    if (!ignoredCollectionOrderInFieldsMatchingRegexes.isEmpty())619      description.append(format("- collection order was ignored in the fields matching the following regexes in the comparison: %s%n",620                                describeRegexes(ignoredCollectionOrderInFieldsMatchingRegexes)));621  }622  private boolean matchesAnIgnoredOverriddenEqualsRegex(Class<?> clazz) {623    if (ignoredOverriddenEqualsForFieldsMatchingRegexes.isEmpty()) return false; // shortcut624    String canonicalName = clazz.getCanonicalName();625    return ignoredOverriddenEqualsForFieldsMatchingRegexes.stream()626                                                          .anyMatch(regex -> regex.matcher(canonicalName).matches());627  }628  private boolean matchesAnIgnoredOverriddenEqualsType(Class<?> clazz) {629    return ignoredOverriddenEqualsForTypes.contains(clazz);630  }631  private boolean matchesAnIgnoredOverriddenEqualsField(FieldLocation fieldLocation) {632    return ignoredOverriddenEqualsForFields.stream().anyMatch(fieldLocation::matches);633  }634  private boolean matchesAnIgnoredNullField(DualValue dualValue) {635    return (ignoreAllActualNullFields && dualValue.actual == null)636           || (ignoreAllExpectedNullFields && dualValue.expected == null);637  }638  private boolean matchesAnIgnoredEmptyOptionalField(DualValue dualValue) {639    return ignoreAllActualEmptyOptionalFields640           && dualValue.isActualFieldAnEmptyOptionalOfAnyType();641  }642  private boolean matchesAnIgnoredFieldRegex(FieldLocation fieldLocation) {643    return ignoredFieldsRegexes.stream()644                               .anyMatch(regex -> regex.matcher(fieldLocation.getPathToUseInRules()).matches());645  }646  private boolean matchesAnIgnoredFieldType(DualValue dualValue) {647    Object actual = dualValue.actual;648    if (actual != null) return ignoredTypes.contains(actual.getClass());649    Object expected = dualValue.expected;650    // actual is null => we can't evaluate its type, we can only reliably check dualValue.expected's type if651    // strictTypeChecking is enabled which guarantees expected is of the same type.652    if (strictTypeChecking && expected != null) return ignoredTypes.contains(expected.getClass());653    // if strictTypeChecking is disabled, we can't safely ignore the field (if we did, we would ignore all null fields!).654    return false;655  }656  private boolean matchesAnIgnoredField(FieldLocation fieldLocation) {657    return ignoredFields.stream().anyMatch(fieldLocation::matches);658  }659  private boolean matchesAnIgnoredCollectionOrderInField(FieldLocation fieldLocation) {660    return ignoredCollectionOrderInFields.stream().anyMatch(fieldLocation::matches);661  }662  private boolean matchesAnIgnoredCollectionOrderInFieldRegex(FieldLocation fieldLocation) {663    String pathToUseInRules = fieldLocation.getPathToUseInRules();664    return ignoredCollectionOrderInFieldsMatchingRegexes.stream().anyMatch(regex -> regex.matcher(pathToUseInRules).matches());665  }666  private String describeIgnoredFields() {667    return join(ignoredFields).with(", ");668  }669  private String describeIgnoredTypes() {670    List<String> typesDescription = ignoredTypes.stream()671                                                .map(Class::getName)672                                                .collect(toList());673    return join(typesDescription).with(", ");674  }675  private String describeIgnoredCollectionOrderInFields() {676    return join(ignoredCollectionOrderInFields).with(", ");677  }678  private String describeRegexes(List<Pattern> regexes) {679    List<String> fieldsDescription = regexes.stream()680                                            .map(Pattern::pattern)681                                            .collect(toList());682    return join(fieldsDescription).with(", ");683  }684  private boolean isConfiguredToIgnoreSomeButNotAllOverriddenEqualsMethods() {685    boolean ignoreSomeOverriddenEqualsMethods = !ignoredOverriddenEqualsForFieldsMatchingRegexes.isEmpty()686                                                || !ignoredOverriddenEqualsForTypes.isEmpty()687                                                || !ignoredOverriddenEqualsForFields.isEmpty();688    return !ignoreAllOverriddenEquals && ignoreSomeOverriddenEqualsMethods;689  }690  private void describeRegisteredComparatorByTypes(StringBuilder description) {691    if (!typeComparators.isEmpty()) {692      description.append(format("- these types were compared with the following comparators:%n"));693      describeComparatorForTypes(description);694    }695  }696  private void describeComparatorForTypes(StringBuilder description) {697    typeComparators.comparatorByTypes()698                   .map(this::formatRegisteredComparatorByType)699                   .forEach(description::append);700  }701  private String formatRegisteredComparatorByType(Entry<Class<?>, Comparator<?>> next) {702    return format("%s %s -> %s%n", INDENT_LEVEL_2, next.getKey().getName(), next.getValue());703  }704  private void describeRegisteredComparatorForFields(StringBuilder description) {705    if (!fieldComparators.isEmpty()) {706      description.append(format("- these fields were compared with the following comparators:%n"));707      describeComparatorForFields(description);708      if (!typeComparators.isEmpty()) {709        description.append(format("- field comparators take precedence over type comparators.%n"));710      }711    }712  }713  private void describeComparatorForFields(StringBuilder description) {714    fieldComparators.comparatorByFields()715                    .map(this::formatRegisteredComparatorForField)716                    .forEach(description::append);717  }718  private String formatRegisteredComparatorForField(Entry<String, Comparator<?>> comparatorForField) {719    return format("%s %s -> %s%n", INDENT_LEVEL_2, comparatorForField.getKey(), comparatorForField.getValue());720  }721  private void describeTypeCheckingStrictness(StringBuilder description) {722    String str = strictTypeChecking723        ? "- actual and expected objects and their fields were considered different when of incompatible types (i.e. expected type does not extend actual's type) even if all their fields match, for example a Person instance will never match a PersonDto (call strictTypeChecking(false) to change that behavior).%n"724        : "- actual and expected objects and their fields were compared field by field recursively even if they were not of the same type, this allows for example to compare a Person to a PersonDto (call strictTypeChecking(true) to change that behavior).%n";725    description.append(format(str));726  }727  /**728   * Creates builder to build {@link RecursiveComparisonConfiguration}.729   * @return created builder730   */731  public static Builder builder() {732    return new Builder();733  }734  /**735   * Builder to build {@link RecursiveComparisonConfiguration}....

describeTypeCheckingStrictness

Using AI Code Generation

1import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;2import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.within;3import static org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration.builder;4import static org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration.strict;5import java.util.ArrayList;6import java.util.List;7import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration;8import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;9class RecursiveComparisonConfigurationTest {10  void test() {11    List<String> list1 = new ArrayList<>();12    list1.add("a");13    list1.add("b");14    list1.add("c");15    List<String> list2 = new ArrayList<>();16    list2.add("a");17    list2.add("b");18    list2.add("c");19    List<String> list3 = new ArrayList<>();20    list3.add("a");21    list3.add("b");22    list3.add("d");23    assertThat(list1).usingRecursiveComparison().isEqualTo(list2);24    assertThat(list1).usingRecursiveComparison().isNotEqualTo(list3);25  }26  void test2() {27    List<String> list1 = new ArrayList<>();28    list1.add("a");29    list1.add("b");30    list1.add("c");31    List<String> list2 = new ArrayList<>();32    list2.add("a");33    list2.add("b");34    list2.add("c");35    List<String> list3 = new ArrayList<>();36    list3.add("a");37    list3.add("b");38    list3.add("d");39    assertThat(list1).usingRecursiveComparison().isEqualTo(list2);40    assertThat(list1).usingRecursiveComparison().isNotEqualTo(list3);41  }42  void test3() {43    List<String> list1 = new ArrayList<>();44    list1.add("a");45    list1.add("b");46    list1.add("c");47    List<String> list2 = new ArrayList<>();48    list2.add("a");49    list2.add("b");50    list2.add("c");51    List<String> list3 = new ArrayList<>();52    list3.add("a");53    list3.add("b");54    list3.add("d");55    assertThat(list1).usingRecursiveComparison().isEqualTo(list2);56    assertThat(list1).usingRecursiveComparison().isNotEqualTo(list3);57  }58  void test4() {

describeTypeCheckingStrictness

Using AI Code Generation

1RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();2configuration.describeTypeCheckingStrictness();3RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();4configuration.isTypeCheckingStrict();5RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();6configuration.failWithCustomMessage("message");7RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();8configuration.withStrictTypeChecking();9RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();10configuration.withStrictTypeChecking(true);11RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();12configuration.isIgnoredType(String.class);13RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();14configuration.ignoreFields("field");15RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();16configuration.ignoreFields("field1","field2");17RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();18configuration.ignoreFields("field1","field2","field3");19RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();20configuration.ignoreFields("field1","field2","field3","field4");21RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();22configuration.ignoreFields("field1","field2","field3","field4","field5");23RecursiveComparisonConfiguration configuration = new RecursiveComparisonConfiguration();24configuration.ignoreFields("field1","field2","field3","field4","field5","field

describeTypeCheckingStrictness

Using AI Code Generation

1org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration describeTypeCheckingStrictness() {2  return new org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration().describeTypeCheckingStrictness()3}4org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration recursiveComparisonStrictTypeChecking() {5  return new org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration().recursiveComparisonStrictTypeChecking()6}7org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration recursiveComparisonStrictTypeChecking(org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.TypeCheckingMode mode) {8  return new org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration().recursiveComparisonStrictTypeChecking(mode)9}10org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration recursiveComparisonStrictTypeChecking(boolean strictTypeChecking) {11  return new org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration().recursiveComparisonStrictTypeChecking(strictTypeChecking)12}13org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration recursiveComparisonStrictTypeChecking(boolean strictTypeChecking, org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.TypeCheckingMode mode) {14  return new org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration().recursiveComparisonStrictTypeChecking(strictTypeChecking, mode)15}16org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration recursiveComparisonStrictTypeChecking(org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.TypeCheckingMode mode, boolean strictTypeChecking) {17  return new org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration().recursiveComparisonStrictTypeChecking(mode, strictTypeChecking)18}19org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration recursiveComparisonStrictTypeChecking(boolean strictTypeChecking, boolean strictTypeCheckingForPrimitives

describeTypeCheckingStrictness

Using AI Code Generation

1import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration2import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration.*3import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration.RecursiveComparisonConfigurationBuilder4    .recursiveComparison()5    .withStrictTypeChecking()6    .build()7    .recursiveComparison()8    .withStrictTypeChecking()9    .withStrictDateComparison()10    .build()11    .recursiveComparison()12    .withStrictTypeChecking()13    .withStrictDateComparison()14    .withStrictTypeCheckingOnActual()15    .build()16    .recursiveComparison()17    .withStrictTypeChecking()18    .withStrictDateComparison()19    .withStrictTypeCheckingOnActual()20    .withStrictTypeCheckingOnExpected()21    .build()22    .recursiveComparison()23    .withStrictTypeChecking()24    .withStrictDateComparison()25    .withStrictTypeCheckingOnActual()26    .withStrictTypeCheckingOnExpected()27    .withStrictTypeCheckingOnFields()28    .build()29import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration30import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration.*31import org.assertj.core.api.recursive.comparison.RecursiveComparisonConfiguration.RecursiveComparisonConfigurationBuilder32    .recursiveComparison()33    .withStrictTypeChecking()34    .build()35    .recursiveComparison()36    .withStrictTypeChecking()37    .withStrictDateComparison()38    .build()39    .recursiveComparison()40    .withStrictTypeChecking()41    .withStrictDateComparison()42    .withStrictTypeCheckingOnActual()43    .build()44    .recursiveComparison()45    .withStrictTypeChecking()46    .withStrictDateComparison()47    .withStrictTypeCheckingOnActual()

Automation Testing Tutorials

Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.